<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science Magazine Ignores Half the Solution</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/07/science-magazine-ignores-half-the-solution/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Progress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technology Research vs. Technology Deployment</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/07/science-magazine-ignores-half-the-solution/#comment-300</link>
		<author>Climate Progress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Technology Research vs. Technology Deployment</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/07/science-magazine-ignores-half-the-solution/#comment-300</guid>
					<description>[...] The article is important and well worth reading in its entirety. Unlike many articles on this subject, it does not neglect the critical area of energy efficiency, and cites recent work by John Holdren, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science: The most immediate gains could come simply by increasing energy efficiency. If efficiency gains in transportation, buildings, power transmission and other areas were doubled from the longstanding rate of 1 percent per year to 2 percent &#8230; that could hold the amount of new nonpolluting energy required by 2100 to the amount derived from fossil fuels in 2000 &#8211;a huge challenge, but not impossible. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The article is important and well worth reading in its entirety. Unlike many articles on this subject, it does not neglect the critical area of energy efficiency, and cites recent work by John Holdren, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science: The most immediate gains could come simply by increasing energy efficiency. If efficiency gains in transportation, buildings, power transmission and other areas were doubled from the longstanding rate of 1 percent per year to 2 percent &#8230; that could hold the amount of new nonpolluting energy required by 2100 to the amount derived from fossil fuels in 2000 &#8211;a huge challenge, but not impossible. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Progress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; **One Climate Solution for Utilities</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/07/science-magazine-ignores-half-the-solution/#comment-2751</link>
		<author>Climate Progress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; **One Climate Solution for Utilities</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/07/science-magazine-ignores-half-the-solution/#comment-2751</guid>
					<description>[...] one of the central strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Until recent, the subject has not been exciting enough to get the kind of media attention that alternative energy generation techn.... But because of the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we all will ultimately have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] one of the central strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Until recent, the subject has not been exciting enough to get the kind of media attention that alternative energy generation techn&#8230;. But because of the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we all will ultimately have to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
