<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s Double-U-Turn on Climate</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/18/bushs-double-u-turn-on-climate/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Good Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/18/bushs-double-u-turn-on-climate/#comment-33</link>
		<author>Good Nonsense</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/18/bushs-double-u-turn-on-climate/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Weather, Water, Energy 9-18-06...&lt;/strong&gt;

How's this for a headline? "Is Lake Michigan Draining?" You just know the Army Corps of Engineers is in there somewhere, don't you? Well, you're right....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Weather, Water, Energy 9-18-06&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>How&#8217;s this for a headline? &#8220;Is Lake Michigan Draining?&#8221; You just know the Army Corps of Engineers is in there somewhere, don&#8217;t you? Well, you&#8217;re right&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Progress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SOTU on Climate: IS THAT ALL THERE IS???</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/18/bushs-double-u-turn-on-climate/#comment-2359</link>
		<author>Climate Progress &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SOTU on Climate: IS THAT ALL THERE IS???</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/18/bushs-double-u-turn-on-climate/#comment-2359</guid>
					<description>[...] Bush&#8217;s much hyped U-Turn on climate wasn&#8217;t even a Double U-Turn. All he said was: America is on the verge of technological breakthroughs that will enable us to live our lives less dependent on oil. And these technologies will help us be better stewards of the environment, and they will help us to confront the serious challenge of global climate change. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bush&#8217;s much hyped U-Turn on climate wasn&#8217;t even a Double U-Turn. All he said was: America is on the verge of technological breakthroughs that will enable us to live our lives less dependent on oil. And these technologies will help us be better stewards of the environment, and they will help us to confront the serious challenge of global climate change. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit Stolz</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/18/bushs-double-u-turn-on-climate/#comment-2369</link>
		<author>Kit Stolz</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2006/09/18/bushs-double-u-turn-on-climate/#comment-2369</guid>
					<description>Did the White House even *try* to bring both parties to the table? I don't recall any attempt to open lines of communication with traditional enviro groups.

And as far as I can tell, the White House has always been open to *suggestions* from fossil fuel industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the White House even *try* to bring both parties to the table? I don&#8217;t recall any attempt to open lines of communication with traditional enviro groups.</p>
<p>And as far as I can tell, the White House has always been open to *suggestions* from fossil fuel industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
