<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology Research vs. Technology Deployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:18:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Pietruszkiewicz</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-34308</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Pietruszkiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-34308</guid>
		<description>As the former Associate Director for Deployment at NREL, I was faced with this issue.  Most people did not understand that tchnology has to be deployed not just invented.  We put much effort into the issues that affected the adoption and maturation of a technology beyond research. I think that all technologies and in fact, all issues or movements must evolve from their infancy to maturity in an evolutionary process, not an event. Funding is always an issue. See my Management and Sustainability blog at www.jonpietruszkiewicz.blogspot.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the former Associate Director for Deployment at NREL, I was faced with this issue.  Most people did not understand that tchnology has to be deployed not just invented.  We put much effort into the issues that affected the adoption and maturation of a technology beyond research. I think that all technologies and in fact, all issues or movements must evolve from their infancy to maturity in an evolutionary process, not an event. Funding is always an issue. See my Management and Sustainability blog at <a href="http://www.jonpietruszkiewicz.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jonpietruszkiewicz.blogspot.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>this article proves that global warming is a true affect,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this article proves that global warming is a true affect,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wotzi</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Wotzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>hi,

Not too sure about Blair.. he&#039;s baselining innovative large-scale future energy in nuke technology. Okay, maybe for one or several as needed to uptake failing older tech plant - ie coal - but widespread nukes utility is down-the-track resources demand. Just tpo run the things and keep them safe. 

They&#039;ll defend Thorium - ie NewGen nuke - but like a lot of things which have arisen from slack vision and management in these so-called &quot;abundance&quot; industries - there&#039;s a deal of work needed on it before safe deployment is possible.

OTOH I&#039;ll back calls to efficiency efficiency efficiency and renewables diversity as the solid way forward. One thing about efficiency that should be stressed is for manufacturers to get off their (I sometimes think) gravytrain with established energy and make like much sharper appliances. No power waste operational appliances, for example.

best now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p>
<p>Not too sure about Blair.. he&#8217;s baselining innovative large-scale future energy in nuke technology. Okay, maybe for one or several as needed to uptake failing older tech plant &#8211; ie coal &#8211; but widespread nukes utility is down-the-track resources demand. Just tpo run the things and keep them safe. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ll defend Thorium &#8211; ie NewGen nuke &#8211; but like a lot of things which have arisen from slack vision and management in these so-called &#8220;abundance&#8221; industries &#8211; there&#8217;s a deal of work needed on it before safe deployment is possible.</p>
<p>OTOH I&#8217;ll back calls to efficiency efficiency efficiency and renewables diversity as the solid way forward. One thing about efficiency that should be stressed is for manufacturers to get off their (I sometimes think) gravytrain with established energy and make like much sharper appliances. No power waste operational appliances, for example.</p>
<p>best now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvin jones</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>calvin jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2006/11/15/technology-research-vs-technology-deployment/#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Just a quick note to lett you know that your blog is included in a recent post on my blog. 

I have just put up a post with a series of links to the best blogs that i have found covering the Nairobi climate talks.
 
http://climatechangeaction.blogspot.com/2006/11/blogs-onfrom-unfccc-cop12-mop2-talks.html
 
I think some of these may be of interest. If you have any additions then let me know and I will append them. 
 
It is my intention that this post serves as a hub for blog coverage of the talks, if you would like to link to the post that would be great. Many of these blogs are new and therefore difficult to find through technorati/google blog search,  and I think there is some value in highlighting blogs that are from rather than mearly about the events unfolding.
 
Regards
Calvin Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick note to lett you know that your blog is included in a recent post on my blog. </p>
<p>I have just put up a post with a series of links to the best blogs that i have found covering the Nairobi climate talks.</p>
<p><a href="http://climatechangeaction.blogspot.com/2006/11/blogs-onfrom-unfccc-cop12-mop2-talks.html" rel="nofollow">http://climatechangeaction.blogspot.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2006/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>11/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>blogs-onfrom-unfccc-cop12-mop2-talks.html</a></p>
<p>I think some of these may be of interest. If you have any additions then let me know and I will append them. </p>
<p>It is my intention that this post serves as a hub for blog coverage of the talks, if you would like to link to the post that would be great. Many of these blogs are new and therefore difficult to find through technorati/google blog search,  and I think there is some value in highlighting blogs that are from rather than mearly about the events unfolding.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Calvin Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
