<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Legislation Guides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:38:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: club penguin</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-53045</link>
		<dc:creator>club penguin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 05:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-53045</guid>
		<description>How much carbon could we save if we banned the things? What would be the trade-off in pollution vs. reducing GHG? Anybody care to wrap their head around that problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much carbon could we save if we banned the things? What would be the trade-off in pollution vs. reducing GHG? Anybody care to wrap their head around that problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tower defense</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-30008</link>
		<dc:creator>tower defense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-30008</guid>
		<description>well written. so easy to understand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well written. so easy to understand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: battery</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-23344</link>
		<dc:creator>battery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-23344</guid>
		<description>I’m not a numbers cruncher like some of you guys, nor would I have access to the pertinent numbers, but consider this: Catalytic converters turn carbon monoxide into [what used to be called ‘harmless’] carbon dioxide. Correct? How much carbon could we save if we banned the things? What would be the trade-off in pollution vs. reducing GHG? Anybody care to wrap their head around that problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m not a numbers cruncher like some of you guys, nor would I have access to the pertinent numbers, but consider this: Catalytic converters turn carbon monoxide into [what used to be called ‘harmless’] carbon dioxide. Correct? How much carbon could we save if we banned the things? What would be the trade-off in pollution vs. reducing GHG? Anybody care to wrap their head around that problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porno izle</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-22733</link>
		<dc:creator>porno izle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-22733</guid>
		<description>Climate Progress At least once or twice a week global warming is the topic of either a House or Senate hearing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate Progress At least once or twice a week global warming is the topic of either a House or Senate hearing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: şarkı sözleri</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-18953</link>
		<dc:creator>şarkı sözleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-18953</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing about this, I missed that article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing about this, I missed that article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great links!  They are appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great links!  They are appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turbulent Issues &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Climate Legislation Guides</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-3485</link>
		<dc:creator>Turbulent Issues &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Climate Legislation Guides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/03/26/climate-legislation-guides/#comment-3485</guid>
		<description>[...] Climate Progress At least once or twice a week global warming is the topic of either a House or Senate hearing, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Climate Progress At least once or twice a week global warming is the topic of either a House or Senate hearing, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
