<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PGDW#3:  Let the Disinfotainment Begin!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/17/pgdw3-let-the-disinfotainment-begin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/17/pgdw3-let-the-disinfotainment-begin/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:05:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/17/pgdw3-let-the-disinfotainment-begin/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/17/pgdw3-let-the-disinfotainment-begin/#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  You might think that conservatives would be for conserving our environment and conserving our energy.  But apparently not.  So the question is what do conservatives actually believed in conserving?

Waxman&#039;s quote is one of the most innocuous statements you could possibly make about global warming.  He didn&#039;t say it was the most important public-policy issue, or that it was one of the most important issues.  So this was a pretty lame example of &quot;hyped-up rhetoric.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  You might think that conservatives would be for conserving our environment and conserving our energy.  But apparently not.  So the question is what do conservatives actually believed in conserving?</p>
<p>Waxman&#8217;s quote is one of the most innocuous statements you could possibly make about global warming.  He didn&#8217;t say it was the most important public-policy issue, or that it was one of the most important issues.  So this was a pretty lame example of &#8220;hyped-up rhetoric.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian C.B.</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/17/pgdw3-let-the-disinfotainment-begin/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian C.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 15:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/05/17/pgdw3-let-the-disinfotainment-begin/#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Waxman&#039;s statement was echoed again today by the NRO&#039;s BFF, and George W. Bush&#039;s last non-Texan friend of any description, Tony Blair. Other than a compulsion to fellate rich fossil-fuel companies, which is just another part of their principled servicing of the rich, when did global-warming denial get to be a conservative value? Is it just another manifestation of conservatives consistent &quot;Building a Bridge to the 17th Century&quot; platform? Another way to laugh at and demean Democrats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waxman&#8217;s statement was echoed again today by the NRO&#8217;s BFF, and George W. Bush&#8217;s last non-Texan friend of any description, Tony Blair. Other than a compulsion to fellate rich fossil-fuel companies, which is just another part of their principled servicing of the rich, when did global-warming denial get to be a conservative value? Is it just another manifestation of conservatives consistent &#8220;Building a Bridge to the 17th Century&#8221; platform? Another way to laugh at and demean Democrats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
