Fred Thompson, Global Warming Denyer
Yes, the next person poised to enter the presidential race has bought the disinformation campaign hook, line, and sinker. From the Paul Harvey radio show (audio here):
Stunning. I have previously debunked this bit of denyer disinformation and will repeat the key facts below. What is most sad to me is the ease with this otherwise intelligent man believes the entire scientific community somehow failed to examine the contribution of the sun to recent global warming.
His Law and Order alter ego D.A. Arthur Branch would not be so easily duped. He would demand evidence. Here it is:
Mars does appear to be experiencing short-term regional warming, not long-term global warming, as the climate scientists of Realclimate.org have explained.
Jupiter is not experiencing global warming, but it is poised to experience regional climate change, “getting warmer near the equator and cooler at the poles,” as a U.C. Berkeley scientist noted last year.
As for Pluto, an MIT article explains “Pluto’s orbit is much more elliptical than that of the other planets, and its rotational axis is tipped by a large angle relative to its orbit. Both factors could contribute to drastic seasonal changes.” One of the scientists involved in the research explained, Pluto’s warming was “likely not connected with that of the Earth. The major way they could be connected is if the warming was caused by a large increase in sunlight. But the solar constant–the amount of sunlight received each second–is carefully monitored by spacecraft, and we know the sun’s output is much too steady to be changing the temperature of Pluto“– or of the Earth, for that matter: “The sunspot record and neutron monitor data,” as Realclimate.org explains, “show that solar activity has not increased since the 1950s and is therefore unlikely to be able to explain the recent warming.”


June 6th, 2007 at 2:28 am
Judith Lean has found that TSI has increased. I’d be embarrased to claim you have debunked solar radiation without referencing J-lean. And I can think of a couple other IPCC authors who conflict with your conclusion. Can you name them?
June 6th, 2007 at 8:09 am
Your post is too cryptic to follow, sorry. Solar is maybe 25%.
June 11th, 2007 at 3:18 pm
My problem is once again hypotheses are parading as facts. The Martian Warming has not been debunked and even if it were this still does not prove man made global warming. This Global Warming religion is reminiscent of the science of Galileo’s time that stated that the sun revolved around the earth.