Comments on: Fred Thompson, Global Warming Denyer http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/04/fred-thompson-global-warming-denyer/ The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:16:08 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Carl Strohmeyer http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/04/fred-thompson-global-warming-denyer/#comment-4531 Carl Strohmeyer Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:18:24 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/04/fred-thompson-global-warming-denyer/#comment-4531 My problem is once again hypotheses are parading as facts. The Martian Warming has not been debunked and even if it were this still does not prove man made global warming. This Global Warming religion is reminiscent of the science of Galileo's time that stated that the sun revolved around the earth. My problem is once again hypotheses are parading as facts. The Martian Warming has not been debunked and even if it were this still does not prove man made global warming. This Global Warming religion is reminiscent of the science of Galileo’s time that stated that the sun revolved around the earth.

]]> By: Joe http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/04/fred-thompson-global-warming-denyer/#comment-4522 Joe Wed, 06 Jun 2007 12:09:26 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/04/fred-thompson-global-warming-denyer/#comment-4522 Your post is too cryptic to follow, sorry. Solar is maybe 25%. Your post is too cryptic to follow, sorry. Solar is maybe 25%.

]]> By: hippie http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/04/fred-thompson-global-warming-denyer/#comment-4521 hippie Wed, 06 Jun 2007 06:28:40 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2007/06/04/fred-thompson-global-warming-denyer/#comment-4521 Judith Lean has found that TSI has increased. I'd be embarrased to claim you have debunked solar radiation without referencing J-lean. And I can think of a couple other IPCC authors who conflict with your conclusion. Can you name them? Judith Lean has found that TSI has increased. I’d be embarrased to claim you have debunked solar radiation without referencing J-lean. And I can think of a couple other IPCC authors who conflict with your conclusion. Can you name them?

]]>