In an article on Barack Obama’s $5 million coal-to-liquid earmark:
But going from coal to fuel is viewed, said the Center for American Progress’s Joe Romm, as “phenomenally expensive, and using a huge amount of water and releasing an enormous amount of greenhouse gases.”
The Politico gets the story right: If you’re going to capture and store carbon, you should make zero-carbon electricity, not high-carbon diesel fuel.
This entry was posted
on Saturday, June 23rd, 2007 at 5:31 pmand is filed under Climate Progress.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
In an article on Barack Obama’s $5 million coal-to-liquid earmark:
