<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate News Roundup</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/08/30/climate-news-roundup-25/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bousquet</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/08/30/climate-news-roundup-25/#comment-5449</link>
		<author>Tim Bousquet</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/08/30/climate-news-roundup-25/#comment-5449</guid>
					<description>It's unclear from the article, but it appears that the Maryland-sized area referred to would provide the biofuel portion of just a *15 percent* biofuel blend of jet fuel. If so, then projected passenger traffic increases will more than cancel out any GHG emission savings gained by biofuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unclear from the article, but it appears that the Maryland-sized area referred to would provide the biofuel portion of just a *15 percent* biofuel blend of jet fuel. If so, then projected passenger traffic increases will more than cancel out any GHG emission savings gained by biofuels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
