Yet one more reason the Washington Times will never be confused with the N.Y. Times
Momentarily, the conservative media fudged their climate coverage - but this time it was a bit personal.
In a front-page article for The Washington Times this week, the statements of Kit Batten–the Center for American Progress’s head of energy and environmental policy–were severely misconstrued. In its article on the climate talks in D.C. this week, the paper wrote:
Except that’s not Batten’s stance at all, nor does that represent Batten’s message during her interview with The Washington Times. Hours later, you can see a much-appreciated editorial correction:
Doh! Bush’s climate summit is nothing more than an obstructionist greenwashing stunt.
The U.S. media in general has blown the climate story countless times, and frankly, wouldn’t it be nice to see bolded CORRECTIONs plastered on each and every one of those pieces?


September 28th, 2007 at 1:34 pm
Here’s a possible solution you may want to discuss -
http://news.google.com/ news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&ncl=1121333390
Also, any word from Hansen on whether he’d like to comment on what I’ve said about AGW science?
September 28th, 2007 at 5:15 pm
Ron,
No, but your Commander-in-Chief of the world still has his eye on the ball.
September 28th, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Any relation?