<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC:  Car of the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/03/bbc-car-of-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/03/bbc-car-of-the-future/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:20:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Klaus D. Beccu, Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/03/bbc-car-of-the-future/#comment-7106</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus D. Beccu, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/03/bbc-car-of-the-future/#comment-7106</guid>
		<description>Hello Dr. Jo Romm, I read your article on Plug-in hybrid cars in the Swiss Journal (Wealth Management, Nov. 07). I cannot more agree with the concept in your article which, of course, is also defended by certain automotive companies. Toyota will bring out a Plug-in Prius in Japan in the very near future and you mention the 2005 .prototype of Daimler-Benz (former D.-Chysler).

As expert of energy &amp; battery technology of Battelle Geneva Research Center (Switzerland) I have a critical viewpoint on this technique. Why ?  At Battelle Geneva was invented in 1967 and pioneer-developed for Daimler-Benz (Germany) the revolutionary Nickelmetalhydride (NiMeHx) rechargeable battery system. In the eighties - after patent protection [in my name] and publication of the results many companies &quot;jumped&quot; on this development and further improved the structure &amp; composition of the alloy-metal absorbing /desorbing the electrolytic hydrogen. The most prominent and successful is the US company Energy conversion Devices (ECD/Ovonics) now associated with Chevron producing (label: COBASYS) and licensing this technology worldwide.  Most of the  present Hybrid cars (Toyota, Honda, GM etc) are equipped with the NiMeHx battery technology 
l
The major problem:  is not at all linked to the use of NiMeHx batteries but is essentially common to all (low voltage) electrochemical power sources and to the need of a minimum voltage of approx. 200 volts (in reality up to 500 V) to efficiently power the electric traction motor. This requires to put in series a very large number of cells (Prius: 278 cells) which develop their electrochemical capacity in charge/discharge cycles differently or even can result in cell drop-outs or short-circuits. Unless expensive and complicated cell sensors with cut-out circuits for such a large number of cells are applied the only way to solve the problem currently is to use only a share of the available capacity (Prius: less than 50%) which increases the weight  of the battery to the double or reduces the driving range. Therefore, the use of Li-Ion cells does not solve the problem. In contrary: the much higher cost (compared to NiMeHx), the many technical problems, e.g. charge sensitiviy, capacity blind drop etc. do not favor Li-Ion cells against the high performance, high capacity and long life NiMeHx- cells.  The solution to this problems consists in an electronic converter approach in order to reduce the number of required cells to a lower number (30 to 50). - Incidentally, also the use of fuel cells will require high performance batteries for the acceleration phase of Elektric cars.

Klaus D. Beccu, Dr.-Ing
Manager, Electrochemical Powr Sources Dept.
Battelle Geneva Research Center
(kdb19665@dplanet.ch)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Dr. Jo Romm, I read your article on Plug-in hybrid cars in the Swiss Journal (Wealth Management, Nov. 07). I cannot more agree with the concept in your article which, of course, is also defended by certain automotive companies. Toyota will bring out a Plug-in Prius in Japan in the very near future and you mention the 2005 .prototype of Daimler-Benz (former D.-Chysler).</p>
<p>As expert of energy &amp; battery technology of Battelle Geneva Research Center (Switzerland) I have a critical viewpoint on this technique. Why ?  At Battelle Geneva was invented in 1967 and pioneer-developed for Daimler-Benz (Germany) the revolutionary Nickelmetalhydride (NiMeHx) rechargeable battery system. In the eighties &#8211; after patent protection [in my name] and publication of the results many companies &#8220;jumped&#8221; on this development and further improved the structure &amp; composition of the alloy-metal absorbing /desorbing the electrolytic hydrogen. The most prominent and successful is the US company Energy conversion Devices (ECD/Ovonics) now associated with Chevron producing (label: COBASYS) and licensing this technology worldwide.  Most of the  present Hybrid cars (Toyota, Honda, GM etc) are equipped with the NiMeHx battery technology<br />
l<br />
The major problem:  is not at all linked to the use of NiMeHx batteries but is essentially common to all (low voltage) electrochemical power sources and to the need of a minimum voltage of approx. 200 volts (in reality up to 500 V) to efficiently power the electric traction motor. This requires to put in series a very large number of cells (Prius: 278 cells) which develop their electrochemical capacity in charge/discharge cycles differently or even can result in cell drop-outs or short-circuits. Unless expensive and complicated cell sensors with cut-out circuits for such a large number of cells are applied the only way to solve the problem currently is to use only a share of the available capacity (Prius: less than 50%) which increases the weight  of the battery to the double or reduces the driving range. Therefore, the use of Li-Ion cells does not solve the problem. In contrary: the much higher cost (compared to NiMeHx), the many technical problems, e.g. charge sensitiviy, capacity blind drop etc. do not favor Li-Ion cells against the high performance, high capacity and long life NiMeHx- cells.  The solution to this problems consists in an electronic converter approach in order to reduce the number of required cells to a lower number (30 to 50). &#8211; Incidentally, also the use of fuel cells will require high performance batteries for the acceleration phase of Elektric cars.</p>
<p>Klaus D. Beccu, Dr.-Ing<br />
Manager, Electrochemical Powr Sources Dept.<br />
Battelle Geneva Research Center<br />
(kdb19665@dplanet.ch)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
