<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Book to Read on &#8220;Freedom from Oil&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John McCormick</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6240</link>
		<author>John McCormick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6240</guid>
					<description>Sounds great.  

The Treasury will write off $8 billion in tax credits for the first million plug-ins.  Then send out $4 billion in rebates for the next million plug-in purchases. And, it will pay $240 million to purchase 30,000 plug-ins.

2,030,000 plug-in purchases at a cost of $12.240 billion to tax payers over 2,3 or 4 years.  Where are the votes for that outlay in a pay-go Congress?

There is another aspect to his proposal.  It is called federal debt.  Sorry to raise this mundane issue but these ideas are cheap until we have to find a way to pay for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great.  </p>
<p>The Treasury will write off $8 billion in tax credits for the first million plug-ins.  Then send out $4 billion in rebates for the next million plug-in purchases. And, it will pay $240 million to purchase 30,000 plug-ins.</p>
<p>2,030,000 plug-in purchases at a cost of $12.240 billion to tax payers over 2,3 or 4 years.  Where are the votes for that outlay in a pay-go Congress?</p>
<p>There is another aspect to his proposal.  It is called federal debt.  Sorry to raise this mundane issue but these ideas are cheap until we have to find a way to pay for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6241</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 13:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6241</guid>
					<description>John:

Thanks for the comment, the plan IS paid for -- I added a bullet to make that clear.

BTW, ending our addiction to oil will not be cheap or politically easy -- if it were, we would have made much more progress already.  Sandalow lays out a technically viable strategy -- the job of a great leader is to make it become politically feasible.  The book has many memos on the political difficulty of achieving all this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, the plan IS paid for &#8212; I added a bullet to make that clear.</p>
<p>BTW, ending our addiction to oil will not be cheap or politically easy &#8212; if it were, we would have made much more progress already.  Sandalow lays out a technically viable strategy &#8212; the job of a great leader is to make it become politically feasible.  The book has many memos on the political difficulty of achieving all this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McCormick</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6242</link>
		<author>John McCormick</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6242</guid>
					<description>Joe, thank you for that information.  This could work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, thank you for that information.  This could work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miqcie</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6253</link>
		<author>miqcie</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6253</guid>
					<description>In terms of making things politically feasible, what incentives would you suggest we offer to oil and natural gas companies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of making things politically feasible, what incentives would you suggest we offer to oil and natural gas companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcwinnie</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6255</link>
		<author>jcwinnie</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6255</guid>
					<description>The book begins by a near-future President telling his staff: “I plan to deliver an address from the Oval Office one month from today. The topic will be oil dependence.”

I assume that it is in the Fantasy / Science Fiction section of the bookstore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book begins by a near-future President telling his staff: “I plan to deliver an address from the Oval Office one month from today. The topic will be oil dependence.”</p>
<p>I assume that it is in the Fantasy / Science Fiction section of the bookstore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kwolph</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6324</link>
		<author>kwolph</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/18/freedom-from-oil-david-sandalow/#comment-6324</guid>
					<description>I have not had a chance to the read the book yet but am curious to learn more about FREEdom standards.  I did a quick google search but did not come up with much information.  Could anyone enlighten me?  

I do know the potential improvement of CAFE and RES standards that are currently be proposed in Congress.  

http://www.energybill2007.us  discusses ACEEE's goal for new CAFE standards is to lower the United State's oil dependency by 2.5 Billion barrels per day in 2030.  It also goes into the ACEEE conclusion that an  effective Renewable Energy Standard plan is  predicted to save in annual energy efficiency by 40 Billion kWH of electricity by 2020.  

If you are curious and want to learn more, check out http://www.energybill2007.us.  And please leave a link if anyone has information about FREEdom.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not had a chance to the read the book yet but am curious to learn more about FREEdom standards.  I did a quick google search but did not come up with much information.  Could anyone enlighten me?  </p>
<p>I do know the potential improvement of CAFE and RES standards that are currently be proposed in Congress.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.energybill2007.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.energybill2007.us</a>  discusses ACEEE&#8217;s goal for new CAFE standards is to lower the United State&#8217;s oil dependency by 2.5 Billion barrels per day in 2030.  It also goes into the ACEEE conclusion that an  effective Renewable Energy Standard plan is  predicted to save in annual energy efficiency by 40 Billion kWH of electricity by 2020.  </p>
<p>If you are curious and want to learn more, check out <a href="http://www.energybill2007.us." rel="nofollow">http://www.energybill2007.us.</a>  And please leave a link if anyone has information about FREEdom.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
