<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon emissions race past all predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John McCormick</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6355</link>
		<dc:creator>John McCormick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6355</guid>
		<description>Joe, the paper is now available at the following link:

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0702737104v1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, the paper is now available at the following link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0702737104v1" rel="nofollow">http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/0702737104v1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tidal</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6303</link>
		<dc:creator>tidal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6303</guid>
		<description>Wow, JB... the global economy shrank during 2000-2006? Who knew? Thanks for that breaking story!

Also, did you perchance miss that part about energy-intensity/$GDP deteriorating?

And it is not &quot;human activity&quot; per se that increase CO2. It&#039;s burning fossil fuels, deforestation and the like... but I already know you get that...

It&#039;s oddly clear from the other site that you could offer a great deal, but instead you just want to play the crank. Pity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, JB&#8230; the global economy shrank during 2000-2006? Who knew? Thanks for that breaking story!</p>
<p>Also, did you perchance miss that part about energy-intensity/$GDP deteriorating?</p>
<p>And it is not &#8220;human activity&#8221; per se that increase CO2. It&#8217;s burning fossil fuels, deforestation and the like&#8230; but I already know you get that&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s oddly clear from the other site that you could offer a great deal, but instead you just want to play the crank. Pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Grinzo</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6302</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Grinzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6302</guid>
		<description>John: &quot;One of the biggest business recessions ever&quot;?  Really???

In any case, perhaps there&#039;s no obvious correlation because there are significant time lags and we&#039;re looking at an accumulation of long-lived CO2 and its effects over years, not a simple &quot;this year this much CO2 means this much warming&quot; equation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: &#8220;One of the biggest business recessions ever&#8221;?  Really???</p>
<p>In any case, perhaps there&#8217;s no obvious correlation because there are significant time lags and we&#8217;re looking at an accumulation of long-lived CO2 and its effects over years, not a simple &#8220;this year this much CO2 means this much warming&#8221; equation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bailo</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6299</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bailo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/10/23/carbon-emissions-race-past-all-predictions/#comment-6299</guid>
		<description>2001 - 2006 huh?  Gee, that was the period of one of the biggest business recessions ever; just like in the 1930s when global temperatures reacted their peaks.   If global warming is the result of human activity, why is there hotter temperatures and more CO2 during the downturns of industry ?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2001 &#8211; 2006 huh?  Gee, that was the period of one of the biggest business recessions ever; just like in the 1930s when global temperatures reacted their peaks.   If global warming is the result of human activity, why is there hotter temperatures and more CO2 during the downturns of industry ?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
