<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Mideast Oil Forever&#8221;  &#8212; Part III:  Abandoning the Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:16:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/#comment-6591</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/#comment-6591</guid>
		<description>Jay -- thanks for the link.  The OTA did great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay &#8212; thanks for the link.  The OTA did great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Alt</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/#comment-6589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Alt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 04:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/#comment-6589</guid>
		<description>Next to last paragraph - &#039;The Office of Technology Assessment&#039;- I seem to remember them.  
Now why would Congress want to be advised on technical matters by nonpartisan experts?  Especially when they can learn &quot;all they need to know&quot; from lobbyists, contributors &amp;  influence peddlers and just make up their own minds.  chuckle.

OTA, Gone (contracted out by Newt) but not forgotten:  

http://jya.com/otapub.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next to last paragraph &#8211; &#8216;The Office of Technology Assessment&#8217;- I seem to remember them.<br />
Now why would Congress want to be advised on technical matters by nonpartisan experts?  Especially when they can learn &#8220;all they need to know&#8221; from lobbyists, contributors &amp;  influence peddlers and just make up their own minds.  chuckle.</p>
<p>OTA, Gone (contracted out by Newt) but not forgotten:  </p>
<p><a href="http://jya.com/otapub.htm" rel="nofollow">http://jya.com/otapub.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/03/mideast-oil-forever-energy-technology/#comment-6584</guid>
		<description>Hurray for new technologies! And hurray for the cuts in government spending!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurray for new technologies! And hurray for the cuts in government spending!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
