Comments on: Absolute MUST Read IPCC Report: Debate over, further delay fatal, action not costly

By: brass valve

brass valve — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:59:02 +0000

Thanks for article. Keep up sharing.

Great article.Thanks.

By: medyum

medyum — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:05:15 +0000

Well this is what we were hoping to get from the report and we got it. Has the world press run with it yet? I don’t see it. It’s truly pitiful. I had to call my local newspaper today to let them know the story even exists.

By: Summer Toys

Summer Toys — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:07:46 +0000

Wow, what a great resource! Thanks for sharing this

By: villainseminyak

villainseminyak — Sat, 16 May 2009 17:40:21 +0000

Wow, what a great resource! Thanks for sharing this

By: cephe kaplama

cephe kaplama — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:10:59 +0000

Thanks a lot.Great site.

By: uçak bileti

uçak bileti — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:21:28 +0000

Have read all of the posts. Very interesting and much better disciplined than most sessions. and thank you for information.

By: フランチャイズ

フランチャイズ — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:10:21 +0000

Tom, your thinking is based on your experience with gasoline vehicles (GVs) where trips to the gas station are both annoying and expensive. You want a big tank to make trips to the gas station infrequent. With an EV one leaves the garage with a full “tank” every morning. That makes the size of the “tank” much less important.thank you格安航空券

By: kiwichick

kiwichick — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:47:33 +0000

For all those who think nukleer is the answer

w.w.w.ceto.com.au

By: cet

cet — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:58:21 +0000

Don’t listen to any of the simplistic calls for nuclear energy until you read “The Lean Guide to Nuclear Energy” at:

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:22:36 +0000

According to environmentalists, why should we permit offshore oil drilling – it will take ten years to implement. So why bother starting.

According to the OP, we have just 4 years to reverse global warming.

By analogy, since it can’t be done in 4 years, why bother starting … we’re screwed anyways.

And it’s always the U.S. that must start immediately … how about China, Russia, India, etc.? Do you think that you will get them to take the appropriate moves within 4 years?

[JR: OP? Of course we have more than 4 years to reverse warming. If we don't start aggressively in the next 4 years, though, then we are very unlikely to avoid 2C warming and probably will get 5C warming. We agreed in 1992 that the rich countries must go first. We are by far the biggest cumulative polluter -- and the richest. If we don't go first, then why would any developing country act?]