<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hansen stands by coal train/death train analogy</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6904</link>
		<author>Ron</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6904</guid>
					<description>I just wonder how people will build levees and dams and other infrastructure to deal with weather disasters if they can't use carbon-based fuels. Seems like you're trying to paint us into a corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder how people will build levees and dams and other infrastructure to deal with weather disasters if they can&#8217;t use carbon-based fuels. Seems like you&#8217;re trying to paint us into a corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6905</link>
		<author>Ronald</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6905</guid>
					<description>The description of crematoriums does not have to mean a reference to murder of people in Germany during World War II.  Crematoriums is in reference to getting Cremated.  

The National Mining Association commentator has taken the Crematorium reference to far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The description of crematoriums does not have to mean a reference to murder of people in Germany during World War II.  Crematoriums is in reference to getting Cremated.  </p>
<p>The National Mining Association commentator has taken the Crematorium reference to far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6908</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6908</guid>
					<description>They will use clean energy -- or make the problem worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will use clean energy &#8212; or make the problem worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6917</link>
		<author>henry</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6917</guid>
					<description>"Until technology is ready, there should be a moratorium on construction of new coal-fired power plants in developed countries. Developing countries must phase out such construction within a decade."

So lets see if I've got this right (to paraphrase Hansen)

Until technology is ready, there should be a moratorium on construction of new coal-fired power plants in the US.  China (developing country), which already has: 1) the world's largest coal driven power plant, 2) most coal mining deaths, and 3) least control over mines (construction, safety, location, etc) can continue using their resources for the next ten years  (must phase out such construction within a decade).

Talk about loaded trains!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Until technology is ready, there should be a moratorium on construction of new coal-fired power plants in developed countries. Developing countries must phase out such construction within a decade.&#8221;</p>
<p>So lets see if I&#8217;ve got this right (to paraphrase Hansen)</p>
<p>Until technology is ready, there should be a moratorium on construction of new coal-fired power plants in the US.  China (developing country), which already has: 1) the world&#8217;s largest coal driven power plant, 2) most coal mining deaths, and 3) least control over mines (construction, safety, location, etc) can continue using their resources for the next ten years  (must phase out such construction within a decade).</p>
<p>Talk about loaded trains!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6922</link>
		<author>john</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-6922</guid>
					<description>Henry:

What folks forget is that the US and the developed countries have been using the atmosphere as their own personal open dump for a century and a half or more.  

It will be about a hundred years before China comes close to causing the same CUMULATIVE  loading of GHG as the US ... so, yeah, if we're concerned about loaded stuff, forget the trains, it's the atmosphere, and we're the loader.

Let me give you an analogy -- Imagine you and your neighbor live in a beautiful wooded area -- even though neither of you own the land, your houses are worth a fortune because of the view and the quiet and the wildlife.  Now, imagine that for ten years he's been cutting down the trees and selling the lumber - even though it's not his property.  Imagine he gets up each morning and hunts the land, and he hasn't had to buy groceries for years.  Between the lumber and the hunting, he's growing rich.  Now imagine he finds some ore and digs up the land and sells the minerals.  He gets even richer.  Meanwhile, your property value has gone down because the view has been destroyed, the animals are disappearing, and the area is covered with open pits.

Finally, you decide you're going to go out, get a chainsaw and a rifle and backhoe and do what he's been doing.  But no sooner do you start than this neighbor comes over and says, "Hey, you've got no right to tear this place up."

Well, that's what you're saying to China.  

As for Hansen's metaphor, if it shocks it's good.  Our enemies are ignorance and complacency, not apt or inapt metaphors.  

For the mining folks to be indignant about anything is kind of like someone who has just caused a mass death getting exorcised about not using the right fork for salad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry:</p>
<p>What folks forget is that the US and the developed countries have been using the atmosphere as their own personal open dump for a century and a half or more.  </p>
<p>It will be about a hundred years before China comes close to causing the same CUMULATIVE  loading of GHG as the US &#8230; so, yeah, if we&#8217;re concerned about loaded stuff, forget the trains, it&#8217;s the atmosphere, and we&#8217;re the loader.</p>
<p>Let me give you an analogy &#8212; Imagine you and your neighbor live in a beautiful wooded area &#8212; even though neither of you own the land, your houses are worth a fortune because of the view and the quiet and the wildlife.  Now, imagine that for ten years he&#8217;s been cutting down the trees and selling the lumber - even though it&#8217;s not his property.  Imagine he gets up each morning and hunts the land, and he hasn&#8217;t had to buy groceries for years.  Between the lumber and the hunting, he&#8217;s growing rich.  Now imagine he finds some ore and digs up the land and sells the minerals.  He gets even richer.  Meanwhile, your property value has gone down because the view has been destroyed, the animals are disappearing, and the area is covered with open pits.</p>
<p>Finally, you decide you&#8217;re going to go out, get a chainsaw and a rifle and backhoe and do what he&#8217;s been doing.  But no sooner do you start than this neighbor comes over and says, &#8220;Hey, you&#8217;ve got no right to tear this place up.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re saying to China.  </p>
<p>As for Hansen&#8217;s metaphor, if it shocks it&#8217;s good.  Our enemies are ignorance and complacency, not apt or inapt metaphors.  </p>
<p>For the mining folks to be indignant about anything is kind of like someone who has just caused a mass death getting exorcised about not using the right fork for salad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henry</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-7151</link>
		<author>henry</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2007/11/26/hansen-stands-by-coal-traindeath-train-analogy/#comment-7151</guid>
					<description>Just a few clips from the media:

"The scale of China's own entangled history with coal is overwhelming. Right across northern China, coal seams burn in un-stoppable fires. 

Some have been burning naturally for thousands of years, but others are being set alight by small-scale mining operations seeking to cash in on soaring coal prices. Together, these perpetual fires are letting off a total amount of carbon dioxide each year equal to all the cars in the USA. 

Far more than previously acknowledged, the battle against global warming will be won or lost in China, even more so than in the West, new data show. 

A report released last week by Beijing authorities indicated that as its economy continues to expand at a red-hot pace, China is highly likely to overtake the United States this year or in 2008 as the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases. 

This information, along with data from the International Energy Agency, the Paris-based alliance of oil importing nations, also revealed that China's greenhouse gas emissions have recently been growing by a total amount much greater than that of all industrialized nations put together."

So, using your reference (about land), I agree - we've been progressing.  So has our neighbor.  Our neighbor has now got 100 times more people than we do, requiring greater resources, and fouling everybody's air at a rate greater than the rest of the world.  And saying it's our fault.

Yet the blame is still being placed on the "developed" world.  If increased pollution is a result of development, then China is more developed than us.

If we want to talk about coal trains of death, who uses more coal?

If shock is what people need to see the problem, consider the future pictures from the next Olympics - in China.  Imagine the stadiums filled with people wearing masks.  Scenes from the "man-on-the-street", looking through the haze.  The smoggy sunsets - see the picture yet?

But that's ok, they signed Kyoto, so they're better that us, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few clips from the media:</p>
<p>&#8220;The scale of China&#8217;s own entangled history with coal is overwhelming. Right across northern China, coal seams burn in un-stoppable fires. </p>
<p>Some have been burning naturally for thousands of years, but others are being set alight by small-scale mining operations seeking to cash in on soaring coal prices. Together, these perpetual fires are letting off a total amount of carbon dioxide each year equal to all the cars in the USA. </p>
<p>Far more than previously acknowledged, the battle against global warming will be won or lost in China, even more so than in the West, new data show. </p>
<p>A report released last week by Beijing authorities indicated that as its economy continues to expand at a red-hot pace, China is highly likely to overtake the United States this year or in 2008 as the world&#8217;s largest emitter of greenhouse gases. </p>
<p>This information, along with data from the International Energy Agency, the Paris-based alliance of oil importing nations, also revealed that China&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions have recently been growing by a total amount much greater than that of all industrialized nations put together.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, using your reference (about land), I agree - we&#8217;ve been progressing.  So has our neighbor.  Our neighbor has now got 100 times more people than we do, requiring greater resources, and fouling everybody&#8217;s air at a rate greater than the rest of the world.  And saying it&#8217;s our fault.</p>
<p>Yet the blame is still being placed on the &#8220;developed&#8221; world.  If increased pollution is a result of development, then China is more developed than us.</p>
<p>If we want to talk about coal trains of death, who uses more coal?</p>
<p>If shock is what people need to see the problem, consider the future pictures from the next Olympics - in China.  Imagine the stadiums filled with people wearing masks.  Scenes from the &#8220;man-on-the-street&#8221;, looking through the haze.  The smoggy sunsets - see the picture yet?</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s ok, they signed Kyoto, so they&#8217;re better that us, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
