Comments on: Watch the Senate Heat Up — Live http://climateprogress.org/2007/12/05/watch-the-senate-heat-up-live/ The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:35:06 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Jay Alt http://climateprogress.org/2007/12/05/watch-the-senate-heat-up-live/#comment-7110 Jay Alt Thu, 06 Dec 2007 02:21:54 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2007/12/05/watch-the-senate-heat-up-live/#comment-7110 'Covered sources' - Industrial and power sources emitting more than 10,000 tons CO2/year (per EPA inventory numbers), according to this 10/16 summary of the draft - http://docs.nrdc.org/globalwarming/glo_07102201A.pdf ‘Covered sources’ – Industrial and power sources emitting more than 10,000 tons CO2/year (per EPA inventory numbers), according to this 10/16 summary of the draft –

http://docs.nrdc.org/ globalwarming/ glo_07102201A.pdf

]]> By: hippie with a pistol http://climateprogress.org/2007/12/05/watch-the-senate-heat-up-live/#comment-7097 hippie with a pistol Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:15:21 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2007/12/05/watch-the-senate-heat-up-live/#comment-7097 I'm curious, what are the "covered emissions" sources addressed in this bill? Power plants, autos, others? What do you know about economic models cited by the committee that assume nuclear power will be generating a greater share of U.S. energy with the number of plants to increase by 100+(?) over the next (30?) years. I’m curious, what are the “covered emissions” sources addressed in this bill? Power plants, autos, others?

What do you know about economic models cited by the committee that assume nuclear power will be generating a greater share of U.S. energy with the number of plants to increase by 100+(?) over the next (30?) years.

]]>