BP proves Beyond Petroleum was greenwashing, joins “biggest global warming crime ever seen”
The tar sands are rightly called one of the world’s greatest environmental crimes, as I’ve written. No company that invests in the Canadian tar sands can legitimately call itself green.
Yet BP, the oil company that lavished millions on advertising its move “Beyond Petroleum,” announced this month it’s putting $3 billion into this dirtiest of dirty fuels!
BP is buying a half-share of the ironically named Sunrise field:
“BP’s move into oil sands is an opportunity to build a strategic, material position and the huge potential of Sunrise is the ideal entry point for BP into Canadian oil sands,” said Tony Hayward, BP’s group chief executive.
The company ultimately plans to produce 200,000 barrels of oil a day from the field.
Shame on you BP!
Just how bad are the tar sands environmentally? As The Independent explains:
What does BP have to say about the environment in its press release?
“The result will be the development of a major new Canadian oil field and the modernization and expansion of the Toledo refinery to allow far greater use of Canadian heavy oil and to increase clean fuels production by as much as 600,000 gallons a day.”
Clean fuels?! Do they really think we are that ignorant and gullible?
Mike Hudema, the climate and energy campaigner for Greenpeace in Canada, had a more accurate description:
By jumping into tar sands extraction it is taking part in the biggest global warming crime ever seen and BP’s green sheen is gone.
If the tar sands are Beyond Petroleum, then BP should just stick with good old petrol for the sake of the planet and stop its greenwashing ads.



December 18th, 2007 at 5:01 pm
Oh my. How shocking. An oil company is investing in oil extraction. What’s next? A pet store selling pets? Dunkin Donuts selling donuts?
December 18th, 2007 at 5:20 pm
Snark away, David. When a company spends millions painting itself as forward-looking and trying to go green (with their investments in solar, particularly) it’s still worth pointing out to people when they throw tar in our faces.
December 18th, 2007 at 5:44 pm
Is that stuff the reason why BP keeps insisting they need to dump more pollution into Lake Michigan from the Whiting, IN refinery?
December 18th, 2007 at 6:03 pm
The tar sands is not so much oil extraction as carbon-intensive oil production. It may be what typical oil companies do, but BP was claiming to be “Beyond Petroleum” and very GHG-friendly. Not!
December 18th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
This solar plan looks much better:
http://www.sciam.com/ article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan
December 18th, 2007 at 10:48 pm
All the oil companies will be falling in the not to distant future. Oil Peak has maybe hit and the oil companies have no other place to go with the decreases in oil production. It makes it that much more important to have plug-in alternatives.