<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain and Clinton’s New Hampshire Victory Fueled by Climate Positions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:45:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SueC</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/#comment-7966</link>
		<dc:creator>SueC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/#comment-7966</guid>
		<description>Well that&#039;s just ridiculous, because Hillary has the most corporate-friendly climate policy of any Dem.  Edwards is the absolute best, with obama next (he still favors liquified coal), but Hillary just offers the same solutions her corporate coal investor backers want to see.  Is she really going to stand up to Citi when the time comes and say, no more coal plants?  I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s just ridiculous, because Hillary has the most corporate-friendly climate policy of any Dem.  Edwards is the absolute best, with obama next (he still favors liquified coal), but Hillary just offers the same solutions her corporate coal investor backers want to see.  Is she really going to stand up to Citi when the time comes and say, no more coal plants?  I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/#comment-7953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/#comment-7953</guid>
		<description>McCain ought to admit he&#039;s not really a Republican and join up with Ms. Clinton for a real winning ticket.

Clinton/McCain in &#039;08!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain ought to admit he&#8217;s not really a Republican and join up with Ms. Clinton for a real winning ticket.</p>
<p>Clinton/McCain in &#8216;08!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon D</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/#comment-7945</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/09/mccain-and-clinton%e2%80%99s-new-hampshire-victory-fueled-by-climate-positions/#comment-7945</guid>
		<description>Joe - How much of their victories would you actually pin on the NH voters&#039; concern about climate change? 

I&#039;d like this press release to be correct. Maybe I&#039;m missing something from my perch in Canada, but it sure looks like i) NH largely likes McCain for his independent style (of which his climate change stance is admittedly a part), ii) the difference b/w the Democrats on climate change is tiny compared to their difference on other issues, and iii) if you were comparing the Democrat policies and their time devoted to the issue of climate change, I don&#039;t think you&#039;d pick Clinton, but Obama, Edwards or Richarson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe &#8211; How much of their victories would you actually pin on the NH voters&#8217; concern about climate change? </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like this press release to be correct. Maybe I&#8217;m missing something from my perch in Canada, but it sure looks like i) NH largely likes McCain for his independent style (of which his climate change stance is admittedly a part), ii) the difference b/w the Democrats on climate change is tiny compared to their difference on other issues, and iii) if you were comparing the Democrat policies and their time devoted to the issue of climate change, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d pick Clinton, but Obama, Edwards or Richarson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
