<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unstoppable disinformation every 15 minutes from Fred Singer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:04:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/#comment-8187</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/#comment-8187</guid>
		<description>Ronald:

The reason he raised questions but didn&#039;t answer them is because the answers were ... inconvenient.

Questioning others&#039; assertions is a favorite tactic of the Sophist -- particularly when they have no intellectual ammo on their side.

And Singer has none.  He&#039;s a scientist for hire ... tobacco, fossil fuel, what&#039;s next for him? The upside of nuclear proliferation?

I have to echo Joe&#039;s question.  Why, when a 2 second Google search yields what a complete morally bankrupt scumbag this guy is, does the press continue to quote him?

OK, Joe didn&#039;t call him a scumbag or question his morality, but I will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald:</p>
<p>The reason he raised questions but didn&#8217;t answer them is because the answers were &#8230; inconvenient.</p>
<p>Questioning others&#8217; assertions is a favorite tactic of the Sophist &#8212; particularly when they have no intellectual ammo on their side.</p>
<p>And Singer has none.  He&#8217;s a scientist for hire &#8230; tobacco, fossil fuel, what&#8217;s next for him? The upside of nuclear proliferation?</p>
<p>I have to echo Joe&#8217;s question.  Why, when a 2 second Google search yields what a complete morally bankrupt scumbag this guy is, does the press continue to quote him?</p>
<p>OK, Joe didn&#8217;t call him a scumbag or question his morality, but I will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/#comment-8183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/#comment-8183</guid>
		<description>I read that book just this last week.   (got it from the library)  I can’t say anything about most of the detailed climatology stuff, because I don’t know that much of it.   From the things that I have read and knew about, the author would only raise questions about stuff, he never answered the questions with what we know is going on.  It was a frustrating read, I always wanted to say, OK, keep going, answer the question you brought up with really what’s causing it and so often he wouldn’t.   This book won’t be used in a climatology class, I’m sure, except as maybe a test on climate, OK, answer this question from the book that the author doesn’t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that book just this last week.   (got it from the library)  I can’t say anything about most of the detailed climatology stuff, because I don’t know that much of it.   From the things that I have read and knew about, the author would only raise questions about stuff, he never answered the questions with what we know is going on.  It was a frustrating read, I always wanted to say, OK, keep going, answer the question you brought up with really what’s causing it and so often he wouldn’t.   This book won’t be used in a climatology class, I’m sure, except as maybe a test on climate, OK, answer this question from the book that the author doesn’t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/#comment-8180</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/20/unstoppable-disinformation-every-15-minutes-from-fred-singer/#comment-8180</guid>
		<description>Might also want to encourage them to read the Hadley Centre report on estimated regional impacts in 2050 CE.  They might, possibly, be a bit concerned about the projected lack of percipitation: drought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might also want to encourage them to read the Hadley Centre report on estimated regional impacts in 2050 CE.  They might, possibly, be a bit concerned about the projected lack of percipitation: drought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
