<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In seeming flipflop, Bush drops mismanaged &#8216;NeverGen&#8217; clean coal project</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Alt</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8352</link>
		<author>Jay Alt</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8352</guid>
					<description>http://www.futuregenalliance.org/news/releases/pr_01-30-08.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.futuregenalliance.org/news/releases/pr_01-30-08.stm" rel="nofollow">http://www.futuregenalliance.org/news/releases/pr_01-30-08.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul K</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8353</link>
		<author>Paul K</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8353</guid>
					<description>Futuregen also &lt;a href="http://www.futuregenalliance.org/news/doe_proposal_fact_check_013108.stm" rel="nofollow"&gt;responded to DOE criticisms. &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Futuregen also <a href="http://www.futuregenalliance.org/news/doe_proposal_fact_check_013108.stm" rel="nofollow">responded to DOE criticisms. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Rankin</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8381</link>
		<author>Robert Rankin</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8381</guid>
					<description>DOE in canceling FutureGen is acknowledging and pursuing a superior technology, called tips. This is owned by an American company, Thermoenergy Corp.

Right now the final pre build and engineering work is being completed by the Canadian National Lab, CANMET Ottawa Canada and headed by Bruce Clements.

TIPS has also gained the favor of MIT professor Dr Gregory McRae, co-author of the "Future of Coal" report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DOE in canceling FutureGen is acknowledging and pursuing a superior technology, called tips. This is owned by an American company, Thermoenergy Corp.</p>
<p>Right now the final pre build and engineering work is being completed by the Canadian National Lab, CANMET Ottawa Canada and headed by Bruce Clements.</p>
<p>TIPS has also gained the favor of MIT professor Dr Gregory McRae, co-author of the &#8220;Future of Coal&#8221; report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul K</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8382</link>
		<author>Paul K</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/01/31/in-seeming-flipflop-bush-drops-mismanaged-nevergen-clean-coal-project/#comment-8382</guid>
					<description>The Futuregen project can go forward. All they need is the $1.2 billion they were going to get from the government. I suppose if 10 million  concerned citizens threw in $10 a month for a year, Futuregen could be built and the government can go ahead and fund the project it thinks is better. On its website Futuregen says the accept donations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Futuregen project can go forward. All they need is the $1.2 billion they were going to get from the government. I suppose if 10 million  concerned citizens threw in $10 a month for a year, Futuregen could be built and the government can go ahead and fund the project it thinks is better. On its website Futuregen says the accept donations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
