<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Subsidy Tease &#8212; Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Prall</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8680</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Prall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8680</guid>
		<description>A great organization that tracks the voting record of our congresscritters on environment and climate issues is the League of Conservation Voters at http://www.lcv.org
They post a &quot;Dirty Dozen&quot; list of the most anti-environmental members, an they raise funds to campaign against them. 
A bill to extend the PTC for wind power--a vital component of one of the real, workable solutions--would certainly figure in their scorecard, and will presumably split on green/brown voting lines. Similarly for a new separate bill for an RPS to support solar PV, micro-hydro, biomass, and other honest sustainable energy sources.
I&#039;ve been reading up on the solar PV industry, and it&#039;s pretty clear that we can expect some serious gains in price-performance in the next one to two years. 
Meanwhile, to change the congress we desperately need voters across the land to bump up climate change to a high priority on their &quot;issue list&quot; and to send that message to the candidates. The last issue list I saw on the news had the economy, Iraq, and other topics, with no spot in the top five for anything about the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great organization that tracks the voting record of our congresscritters on environment and climate issues is the League of Conservation Voters at <a href="http://www.lcv.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.lcv.org</a><br />
They post a &#8220;Dirty Dozen&#8221; list of the most anti-environmental members, an they raise funds to campaign against them.<br />
A bill to extend the PTC for wind power&#8211;a vital component of one of the real, workable solutions&#8211;would certainly figure in their scorecard, and will presumably split on green/brown voting lines. Similarly for a new separate bill for an RPS to support solar PV, micro-hydro, biomass, and other honest sustainable energy sources.<br />
I&#8217;ve been reading up on the solar PV industry, and it&#8217;s pretty clear that we can expect some serious gains in price-performance in the next one to two years.<br />
Meanwhile, to change the congress we desperately need voters across the land to bump up climate change to a high priority on their &#8220;issue list&#8221; and to send that message to the candidates. The last issue list I saw on the news had the economy, Iraq, and other topics, with no spot in the top five for anything about the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul K</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8664</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8664</guid>
		<description>I also think it would be useful to have an itemized list of the subsidies provided to oil companies and to alternatives as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think it would be useful to have an itemized list of the subsidies provided to oil companies and to alternatives as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul K</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8663</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8663</guid>
		<description>The election is in November, long past when the PTC will lapse. Am I right to infer that PTC is now attached to the senate version of the stimulus package which is &quot;in conference&quot;? If so, political action must be directed at the House of Representatives, especially those members serving on the conference committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The election is in November, long past when the PTC will lapse. Am I right to infer that PTC is now attached to the senate version of the stimulus package which is &#8220;in conference&#8221;? If so, political action must be directed at the House of Representatives, especially those members serving on the conference committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8660</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/14/the-subsidy-tease-part-ii/#comment-8660</guid>
		<description>Bill B. wrote &lt;i&gt;... let it be crystal clear which Members favor business as usual over the nation’s economic and environmental health.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes.  We all need to help get the word out in our state (senatorial elections) and in our district (as all representatives are up for election).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill B. wrote <i>&#8230; let it be crystal clear which Members favor business as usual over the nation’s economic and environmental health.</i></p>
<p>Yes.  We all need to help get the word out in our state (senatorial elections) and in our district (as all representatives are up for election).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
