<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU-27 Emissions down 8% since 1990</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:54:23 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8917</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8917</guid>
		<description>Spain and Portugal were basically treated as not fully developed countries.
Switching from coal to gas is legit.  Then you switch to zero-carbon sources.
China remains a big issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spain and Portugal were basically treated as not fully developed countries.<br />
Switching from coal to gas is legit.  Then you switch to zero-carbon sources.<br />
China remains a big issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8916</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8916</guid>
		<description>Yes, but ... how much of the EU reduction comes from exporting heavy industry to China, etc, and from switching from coal to gas.  Of course, switching from coal to gas is not a bad thing (at least, if you&#039;ve still got gas) but it&#039;s not something you can repeat so it&#039;s not obvious to me that this is trend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but &#8230; how much of the EU reduction comes from exporting heavy industry to China, etc, and from switching from coal to gas.  Of course, switching from coal to gas is not a bad thing (at least, if you&#8217;ve still got gas) but it&#8217;s not something you can repeat so it&#8217;s not obvious to me that this is trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew E</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8915</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8915</guid>
		<description>Also missing is the spectacular failure of Canada to reduce its emissions despite being a proponent of Kyoto.  Our GHG emissions per capita rival that of the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also missing is the spectacular failure of Canada to reduce its emissions despite being a proponent of Kyoto.  Our GHG emissions per capita rival that of the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew E</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8914</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8914</guid>
		<description>A little confused...please clarify.

The blue bar represents actual reduction so far and the red bar represents required reductions.  Is this correct?

If that&#039;s the case, then how did Spain and Portugal get their Kyoto targets to be significant *increases* from 1990?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little confused&#8230;please clarify.</p>
<p>The blue bar represents actual reduction so far and the red bar represents required reductions.  Is this correct?</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case, then how did Spain and Portugal get their Kyoto targets to be significant *increases* from 1990?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8913</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8913</guid>
		<description>Yes, strange, in fact, that the dollar has been collapsing against the Euro.  Why, it&#039;s almost as if they have been getting richer while we have been getting poorer.  But that&#039;s not possible, is it???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, strange, in fact, that the dollar has been collapsing against the Euro.  Why, it&#8217;s almost as if they have been getting richer while we have been getting poorer.  But that&#8217;s not possible, is it???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8911</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/02/25/eu-27-emissions-down-8-since-1990/#comment-8911</guid>
		<description>If they&#039;ve decreased CO2 emissions then their economies must be suffering...

Oh they aren&#039;t?  &quot;The Delayers&quot; are wrong again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#8217;ve decreased CO2 emissions then their economies must be suffering&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh they aren&#8217;t?  &#8220;The Delayers&#8221; are wrong again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
