<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Cars to Get Global Warming Stickers</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9303</link>
		<author>David B. Benson</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9303</guid>
					<description>Better would be to reverse the scale so that 'small is beautiful'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better would be to reverse the scale so that &#8217;small is beautiful&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mashey</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9309</link>
		<author>John Mashey</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9309</guid>
					<description>Hard to tell, after all, MPG City/country is something people are used to, and the "choose" label is fairly clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to tell, after all, MPG City/country is something people are used to, and the &#8220;choose&#8221; label is fairly clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance Wagner</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9310</link>
		<author>Vance Wagner</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9310</guid>
					<description>Too much information!  I'd prefer a single environmental score that encompasses both criteria pollutant and GHG emissions.   Otherwise, I fear the consumer will either ignore the extra numbers (this is even in addition to the national FE label, correct?) and / or be confused about whether to go for a higher GHG or air pollution score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much information!  I&#8217;d prefer a single environmental score that encompasses both criteria pollutant and GHG emissions.   Otherwise, I fear the consumer will either ignore the extra numbers (this is even in addition to the national FE label, correct?) and / or be confused about whether to go for a higher GHG or air pollution score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMG</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9314</link>
		<author>JMG</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9314</guid>
					<description>Isn't a "planet saver score" on a sticker used to pimp new automobiles like putting a "peacekeeping score" on automatic weapons or an "abstinence pledge score" on condoms?

Shouldn't "planet saver scores" be reserved for bikes or, at most, mass transit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t a &#8220;planet saver score&#8221; on a sticker used to pimp new automobiles like putting a &#8220;peacekeeping score&#8221; on automatic weapons or an &#8220;abstinence pledge score&#8221; on condoms?</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;planet saver scores&#8221; be reserved for bikes or, at most, mass transit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
