<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Cars to Get Global Warming Stickers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:25:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JMG</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9314</link>
		<dc:creator>JMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9314</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t a &quot;planet saver score&quot; on a sticker used to pimp new automobiles like putting a &quot;peacekeeping score&quot; on automatic weapons or an &quot;abstinence pledge score&quot; on condoms?

Shouldn&#039;t &quot;planet saver scores&quot; be reserved for bikes or, at most, mass transit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t a &#8220;planet saver score&#8221; on a sticker used to pimp new automobiles like putting a &#8220;peacekeeping score&#8221; on automatic weapons or an &#8220;abstinence pledge score&#8221; on condoms?</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;planet saver scores&#8221; be reserved for bikes or, at most, mass transit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vance Wagner</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9310</link>
		<dc:creator>Vance Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9310</guid>
		<description>Too much information!  I&#039;d prefer a single environmental score that encompasses both criteria pollutant and GHG emissions.   Otherwise, I fear the consumer will either ignore the extra numbers (this is even in addition to the national FE label, correct?) and / or be confused about whether to go for a higher GHG or air pollution score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too much information!  I&#8217;d prefer a single environmental score that encompasses both criteria pollutant and GHG emissions.   Otherwise, I fear the consumer will either ignore the extra numbers (this is even in addition to the national FE label, correct?) and / or be confused about whether to go for a higher GHG or air pollution score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mashey</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9309</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mashey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9309</guid>
		<description>Hard to tell, after all, MPG City/country is something people are used to, and the &quot;choose&quot; label is fairly clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to tell, after all, MPG City/country is something people are used to, and the &#8220;choose&#8221; label is fairly clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9303</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/09/california-cars-to-get-global-warming-stickers/#comment-9303</guid>
		<description>Better would be to reverse the scale so that &#039;small is beautiful&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better would be to reverse the scale so that &#8217;small is beautiful&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
