<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA finds low cost for deep GHG cuts</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9517</link>
		<author>David B. Benson</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9517</guid>
					<description>What is an 'emmision allowence'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is an &#8216;emmision allowence&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9605</link>
		<author>Martin</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9605</guid>
					<description>Good question. I would venture that the prices are for a ton of CO2, not a ton of C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I would venture that the prices are for a ton of CO2, not a ton of C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
