<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA finds low cost for deep GHG cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:55:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9605</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9605</guid>
		<description>Good question. I would venture that the prices are for a ton of CO2, not a ton of C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. I would venture that the prices are for a ton of CO2, not a ton of C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9517</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/17/epa-finds-low-cost-for-deep-ghg-cuts/#comment-9517</guid>
		<description>What is an &#039;emmision allowence&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is an &#8216;emmision allowence&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
