Comments on: Latest dodge from EPA’s Johnson http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/ The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:32:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1 By: Earl Killian http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10246 Earl Killian Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:11:11 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10246 Joe, you are far too kind in calling it a "do-nothing Administration". Joe, you are far too kind in calling it a “do-nothing Administration”.

]]> By: Paul K http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10247 Paul K Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:11:51 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10247 I'm not going to defend Johnson, but shouldn't this be in the Congress's portfolio? Neither the Judicial nor the Executive branch is supposed to make law. I’m not going to defend Johnson, but shouldn’t this be in the Congress’s portfolio? Neither the Judicial nor the Executive branch is supposed to make law.

]]> By: Earl Killian http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10248 Earl Killian Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:16:44 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10248 Paul K, there is a law. It is called the Clean Air Act. It tells the EPA to act. Even the Supreme Court, with all those Republican appointees, agreed that the EPA was supposed to act. Paul K, there is a law. It is called the Clean Air Act. It tells the EPA to act. Even the Supreme Court, with all those Republican appointees, agreed that the EPA was supposed to act.

]]> By: Paul K http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10250 Paul K Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:25:12 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/31/latest-dodge-from-epas-johnson/#comment-10250 Earl Killian, Point taken, however I think it would be better if these regulations were codified in law and not subject to the whims of individual administrations and bureaucrats. Joe, This is your area of expertise. How about a model set of regulations that we could compare to what this or the next administration proposes? Earl Killian,
Point taken, however I think it would be better if these regulations were codified in law and not subject to the whims of individual administrations and bureaucrats.

Joe,
This is your area of expertise. How about a model set of regulations that we could compare to what this or the next administration proposes?

]]>