<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is 450 ppm (or less) politically possible? Part 2:  The Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:52:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Matthews, ArchitectureWeek</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-97033</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Matthews, ArchitectureWeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 22:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-97033</guid>
		<description>I suspect a solid case can be made for a wedge of reduced vehicles miles traveled (VMT), providing carbon savings in reducing both transportation fuel consumption and roadway infrastructure costs.

VMT can be reduced first and foremost through improved land use, capitalizing on the inherent geography of VMT in and around metropolitan areas, as Oregon pre-visioned and California has started to legislate. A range of other techniques will contribute.

Like other base level consumption reductions, and unlike fuel substitutions, the savings multiply through the system. So I&#039;ll trade you a wedge of savings through reduced VMT for a wedge of cellulosic biofuels, which are still increasingly dubious as to actual net carbon savings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect a solid case can be made for a wedge of reduced vehicles miles traveled (VMT), providing carbon savings in reducing both transportation fuel consumption and roadway infrastructure costs.</p>
<p>VMT can be reduced first and foremost through improved land use, capitalizing on the inherent geography of VMT in and around metropolitan areas, as Oregon pre-visioned and California has started to legislate. A range of other techniques will contribute.</p>
<p>Like other base level consumption reductions, and unlike fuel substitutions, the savings multiply through the system. So I&#8217;ll trade you a wedge of savings through reduced VMT for a wedge of cellulosic biofuels, which are still increasingly dubious as to actual net carbon savings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: student</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-45473</link>
		<dc:creator>student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 01:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-45473</guid>
		<description>We could easly build cars the get  gas milage close to100 miles per gallon
I am working on a design to convert a Geo metro to a 3 wheel motor cycle 3rd whell will be electric and it shoudget well over 100 MPH and still get 80 + gas only mode we just need smaller cars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could easly build cars the get  gas milage close to100 miles per gallon<br />
I am working on a design to convert a Geo metro to a 3 wheel motor cycle 3rd whell will be electric and it shoudget well over 100 MPH and still get 80 + gas only mode we just need smaller cars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barackoli</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-39754</link>
		<dc:creator>Barackoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-39754</guid>
		<description>i have read this post. Interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have read this post. Interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Resource</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-34653</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Resource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-34653</guid>
		<description>This post and all replies is a great climate resource.
Thanks all of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post and all replies is a great climate resource.<br />
Thanks all of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mercer</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-34557</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-34557</guid>
		<description>What about biomass to methane?  Cow manure, sewage treatment plants, landfills,  etc. How big a part could this play?  

Bioplastics

A company called Converted Organics turns food waste into fertilizer. Basically composting on an industrial scale. 

Is it possible that there are several smaller solutions, maybe like these, that together add up to a wedge?

Hemp for paper as part of the reforestation wedge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about biomass to methane?  Cow manure, sewage treatment plants, landfills,  etc. How big a part could this play?  </p>
<p>Bioplastics</p>
<p>A company called Converted Organics turns food waste into fertilizer. Basically composting on an industrial scale. </p>
<p>Is it possible that there are several smaller solutions, maybe like these, that together add up to a wedge?</p>
<p>Hemp for paper as part of the reforestation wedge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cephe kaplama</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-34400</link>
		<dc:creator>cephe kaplama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-34400</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdulkerim</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-32029</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdulkerim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-32029</guid>
		<description>Thanks you site admin..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you site admin..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-okul</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-29901</link>
		<dc:creator>e-okul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-29901</guid>
		<description>Thanks you webmaster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks you webmaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShellyT</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-28129</link>
		<dc:creator>ShellyT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-28129</guid>
		<description>OK, the political picture has changed.
Do you think that stabilizing at 450ppm is politically possible now that Obama is in office?

All I know is that this is dire  and since Obama isn&#039;t stupid, there must be some hope for this goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, the political picture has changed.<br />
Do you think that stabilizing at 450ppm is politically possible now that Obama is in office?</p>
<p>All I know is that this is dire  and since Obama isn&#8217;t stupid, there must be some hope for this goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 350-001</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-27972</link>
		<dc:creator>350-001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/22/is-450-ppm-or-less-politically-possible-part-2-the-solution/#comment-27972</guid>
		<description>Thank You for this :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You for this <img src='http://climateprogress.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
