<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;The End of the World as You Know It&#8217; &#8212; or not</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: tidal</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11765</link>
		<author>tidal</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11765</guid>
					<description>Klare writes: &#62;

Actually, to a *MUCH* larger degree, they are investing those mega-profits into share buybacks... which presumably signals something about how valuable - and 'relatively' cheap - they presumably think their *existing* reserves are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Klare writes: &gt;</p>
<p>Actually, to a *MUCH* larger degree, they are investing those mega-profits into share buybacks&#8230; which presumably signals something about how valuable - and &#8216;relatively&#8217; cheap - they presumably think their *existing* reserves are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tidal</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11766</link>
		<author>tidal</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11766</guid>
					<description>Ooops, I guess my Klare quote got eaten by the html editor... Previous post should read in full:

Klare writes: "Instead, the major energy firms... are putting their mega-windfall profits from rising energy prices into vastly expensive (and environmentally questionable) schemes to extract oil and gas from Alaska and the Arctic, or to drill in the deep and difficult waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean."

Actually, to a *MUCH* larger degree, they are investing those mega-profits into share buybacks… which presumably signals something about how valuable - and ‘relatively’ cheap - they presumably think their *existing* reserves are…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, I guess my Klare quote got eaten by the html editor&#8230; Previous post should read in full:</p>
<p>Klare writes: &#8220;Instead, the major energy firms&#8230; are putting their mega-windfall profits from rising energy prices into vastly expensive (and environmentally questionable) schemes to extract oil and gas from Alaska and the Arctic, or to drill in the deep and difficult waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, to a *MUCH* larger degree, they are investing those mega-profits into share buybacks… which presumably signals something about how valuable - and ‘relatively’ cheap - they presumably think their *existing* reserves are…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11768</link>
		<author>paulm</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11768</guid>
					<description>How quickly could electric transport replace the existing petrol model? Can solar support the manufacturing energy requirements in the near future? What about all the other cheap products we get from oil - manufacturing cost will sky rocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How quickly could electric transport replace the existing petrol model? Can solar support the manufacturing energy requirements in the near future? What about all the other cheap products we get from oil - manufacturing cost will sky rocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11769</link>
		<author>David B. Benson</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11769</guid>
					<description>paulm --- Bioplastics, both biodegradable and permanent, are already at the pilot plant stage.  Expect demonstration plant stage within a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paulm &#8212; Bioplastics, both biodegradable and permanent, are already at the pilot plant stage.  Expect demonstration plant stage within a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Salmony</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11773</link>
		<author>Steve Salmony</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11773</guid>
					<description>Become a CLIMATE HERO by simply speaking out!

A failure of unimaginable proportions is bound up in the the willful blindness, hysterical deafness and elective mutism of so many opinion leaders, economic powerbrokers, politicians and business tycoons who do not speak out openly, loudly and clearly about the world we inhabit as bounded and limited in space with finite resources. Their idolatry of the endless expansion of the global political economy is not only selfish, arrogant and unrealistic; they are also perversely choosing to espouse a “primrose path” of unbridled economic globalization to our children, a path to the future that a relatively small planet with the size and make-up of Earth cannot possibly sustain much longer, much less to the year 2050.

At least to me, this failure by my not-so-great generation of leading elders is a “sin of omission” and tantamount to a passive criminal act against the family of humanity, life as we know it and the Earth God blesses us to inhabit….and not ruin, I suppose. 

Steven Earl Salmony
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,
established 2001
http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Become a CLIMATE HERO by simply speaking out!</p>
<p>A failure of unimaginable proportions is bound up in the the willful blindness, hysterical deafness and elective mutism of so many opinion leaders, economic powerbrokers, politicians and business tycoons who do not speak out openly, loudly and clearly about the world we inhabit as bounded and limited in space with finite resources. Their idolatry of the endless expansion of the global political economy is not only selfish, arrogant and unrealistic; they are also perversely choosing to espouse a “primrose path” of unbridled economic globalization to our children, a path to the future that a relatively small planet with the size and make-up of Earth cannot possibly sustain much longer, much less to the year 2050.</p>
<p>At least to me, this failure by my not-so-great generation of leading elders is a “sin of omission” and tantamount to a passive criminal act against the family of humanity, life as we know it and the Earth God blesses us to inhabit….and not ruin, I suppose. </p>
<p>Steven Earl Salmony<br />
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,<br />
established 2001<br />
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hapa</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11798</link>
		<author>hapa</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11798</guid>
					<description>@paulm

&lt;i&gt;How quickly could electric transport replace the existing petrol model?&lt;/i&gt;

pretty fast. the electric grid is big and universal; "idling" overnight fossil fuel plants would fill the batteries with very low additional fuel consumption; and far as i can tell, all the wind capacity one could ask for needs can come online in a matter of years if steel is diverted from things like, oh, i dunno, heavy cars, maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@paulm</p>
<p><i>How quickly could electric transport replace the existing petrol model?</i></p>
<p>pretty fast. the electric grid is big and universal; &#8220;idling&#8221; overnight fossil fuel plants would fill the batteries with very low additional fuel consumption; and far as i can tell, all the wind capacity one could ask for needs can come online in a matter of years if steel is diverted from things like, oh, i dunno, heavy cars, maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Killian</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11806</link>
		<author>Earl Killian</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11806</guid>
					<description>paulm, hapa: I'm an EV advocate, but I don't see the transition being that fast.  Take a look at the two graphs at the bottom of
http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/13/killing-the-electric-car-again-part-1/
to see what I consider to be a fast transition to new technology for (1) new sales, and (2) the vehicle fleet.  Click on the small pictures to see them at readable size.

The problem is that it takes a long time for new vehicle sales to change the vehicle fleet (e.g. 15-20 years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paulm, hapa: I&#8217;m an EV advocate, but I don&#8217;t see the transition being that fast.  Take a look at the two graphs at the bottom of<br />
<a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/03/13/killing-the-electric-car-again-part-1/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2008/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>03/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>13/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>killing-the-electric-car-again-part-1/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span></a><br />
to see what I consider to be a fast transition to new technology for (1) new sales, and (2) the vehicle fleet.  Click on the small pictures to see them at readable size.</p>
<p>The problem is that it takes a long time for new vehicle sales to change the vehicle fleet (e.g. 15-20 years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11817</link>
		<author>Robert</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11817</guid>
					<description>"While I have been a fan of Klare’s writing on security, I think that he, like Kuntsler, ..."

Unfortunate spelling mistake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While I have been a fan of Klare’s writing on security, I think that he, like Kuntsler, &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunate spelling mistake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hapa</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11830</link>
		<author>hapa</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/04/29/the-end-of-the-world-as-you-know-it-or-not/#comment-11830</guid>
					<description>@earlk: ...and it can take millions of years for the ocean to erode a cliff and shell oil's thrilling "blueprints" scenario has 40% of energy in 2050 generated by fossil fuels -- mostly coal, a near tripling.

but that is not &lt;em&gt;our&lt;/em&gt; situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@earlk: &#8230;and it can take millions of years for the ocean to erode a cliff and shell oil&#8217;s thrilling &#8220;blueprints&#8221; scenario has 40% of energy in 2050 generated by fossil fuels &#8212; mostly coal, a near tripling.</p>
<p>but that is not <em>our</em> situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
