<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kansas House Sustains Veto</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/03/kansas-house-sustains-veto/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/03/kansas-house-sustains-veto/#comment-11969</link>
		<author>Andrew</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 13:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/03/kansas-house-sustains-veto/#comment-11969</guid>
					<description>Thank you Governor! I live in Kansas City suburbs and every time I see her often at events and KU basketball games I don't never forget to thank her for her efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Governor! I live in Kansas City suburbs and every time I see her often at events and KU basketball games I don&#8217;t never forget to thank her for her efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mashey</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/03/kansas-house-sustains-veto/#comment-11976</link>
		<author>John Mashey</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/03/kansas-house-sustains-veto/#comment-11976</guid>
					<description>Kansas has some &lt;a href="http://www.kansasenergy.org/renewable_issues.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;work to do&lt;/a&gt;.  like PG&#38;E CEO Peter Darbee says: utilities worry about efficinecy when PUCs sert rules that incent that, otherwise, don't expect anything to change away from maximizing megawatts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kansas has some <a href="http://www.kansasenergy.org/renewable_issues.htm" rel="nofollow">work to do</a>.  like PG&amp;E CEO Peter Darbee says: utilities worry about efficinecy when PUCs sert rules that incent that, otherwise, don&#8217;t expect anything to change away from maximizing megawatts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Killian</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/03/kansas-house-sustains-veto/#comment-11981</link>
		<author>Earl Killian</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/03/kansas-house-sustains-veto/#comment-11981</guid>
					<description>Kari, does Kansas decouple utility profits from revenue?  If not, perhaps Sebelius should propose it.  Then the utilities could sell negawatts instead of megawatts and make a nice profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kari, does Kansas decouple utility profits from revenue?  If not, perhaps Sebelius should propose it.  Then the utilities could sell negawatts instead of megawatts and make a nice profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
