<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warming&#8217;s new hybrid &#8212; the Grolar bear or Pizzly</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: hapa</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12474</link>
		<author>hapa</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12474</guid>
					<description>when i "researched" human skin color last year i learned a fun relevant thing about genetic traits -- some are harder to gain than others -- based on environmental pressure. medium to dark brown is where we started, "they" said, and super white and super black were both responses to extreme sunlight differences on equatorial savanna and in the cloudy north. the difference is that white skin represents a weakened genetic trait and black skin an intensification.

the point being if bears have to all go much darker to survive, or we do, that's much tougher than bleached cousins having kids with "normal" as part of finding a new comfort zone in the typical range of species. as a teacher of mine likes to quote, "skin color is a geographic mirage."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i &#8220;researched&#8221; human skin color last year i learned a fun relevant thing about genetic traits &#8212; some are harder to gain than others &#8212; based on environmental pressure. medium to dark brown is where we started, &#8220;they&#8221; said, and super white and super black were both responses to extreme sunlight differences on equatorial savanna and in the cloudy north. the difference is that white skin represents a weakened genetic trait and black skin an intensification.</p>
<p>the point being if bears have to all go much darker to survive, or we do, that&#8217;s much tougher than bleached cousins having kids with &#8220;normal&#8221; as part of finding a new comfort zone in the typical range of species. as a teacher of mine likes to quote, &#8220;skin color is a geographic mirage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12497</link>
		<author>Reader</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 04:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12497</guid>
					<description>http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/05/polar-bears.html

Why go to India for your news, Joe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/05/polar-bears.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/05/polar-bears.html</a></p>
<p>Why go to India for your news, Joe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul K</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12498</link>
		<author>Paul K</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12498</guid>
					<description>It's really sad that climateprogress has been reduced to misrepresenting two year old stories to further the campaign of fear. Key quote from the original National Geographic article: "The hybrid, he said, is definitely not a sign of climate change."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really sad that climateprogress has been reduced to misrepresenting two year old stories to further the campaign of fear. Key quote from the original National Geographic article: &#8220;The hybrid, he said, is definitely not a sign of climate change.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nylo</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12506</link>
		<author>Nylo</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12506</guid>
					<description>hapa,

A white skin in human race may be a weakening of a characteristic which is no longer needed - sun protection in the north. But the white fur of polar bears is definitely not a weakening of anything. It's a succesfuly reached new characteristic that blends them with their surroundings better than a dark fur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hapa,</p>
<p>A white skin in human race may be a weakening of a characteristic which is no longer needed - sun protection in the north. But the white fur of polar bears is definitely not a weakening of anything. It&#8217;s a succesfuly reached new characteristic that blends them with their surroundings better than a dark fur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12516</link>
		<author>Reader</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12516</guid>
					<description>Paul,

It's sad, I suppose, but says something profound about the state of the 'war', does it not?

Don't forget that  Joe is a well-paid alarmist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad, I suppose, but says something profound about the state of the &#8216;war&#8217;, does it not?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget that  Joe is a well-paid alarmist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pahbs</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12549</link>
		<author>Pahbs</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12549</guid>
					<description>Well fellaz - Before we resort to name-calling, lets read the entire article. After Paetkau says that the hybrid he found is not a sign of climate change, you need to read the "Lingering Questions" section right at the end of the article:
----------
"Paetkau adds that the hybrid bear raises several questions........

....On the other hand, the warming Arctic environment is causing some animals to shift their range northward. It's possible, Paetkau says, that grizzly bears and polar bears may have more offspring-producing encounters in the future.

"With one sample, we have no way of distinguishing between the possibilities," he said.

"But it does make you sit up straight and want to keep track of that situation and get a sense over the next decade whether this will be a regular occurrence or whether it's a one-off." 
--------
See, we all like to snatch facts out of context to provide some sort of "gotcha" punchline. This is not objective nor productive.  In this case, one instance of a species hybrid can't be a determinant for or against something as global as climate change. The questions is, does it represent an anomaly or does it represent a new pattern? Given the context of changing global environmental patterns, it is worth investigating.

Just be objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well fellaz - Before we resort to name-calling, lets read the entire article. After Paetkau says that the hybrid he found is not a sign of climate change, you need to read the &#8220;Lingering Questions&#8221; section right at the end of the article:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8220;Paetkau adds that the hybrid bear raises several questions&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8230;.On the other hand, the warming Arctic environment is causing some animals to shift their range northward. It&#8217;s possible, Paetkau says, that grizzly bears and polar bears may have more offspring-producing encounters in the future.</p>
<p>&#8220;With one sample, we have no way of distinguishing between the possibilities,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>&#8220;But it does make you sit up straight and want to keep track of that situation and get a sense over the next decade whether this will be a regular occurrence or whether it&#8217;s a one-off.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
See, we all like to snatch facts out of context to provide some sort of &#8220;gotcha&#8221; punchline. This is not objective nor productive.  In this case, one instance of a species hybrid can&#8217;t be a determinant for or against something as global as climate change. The questions is, does it represent an anomaly or does it represent a new pattern? Given the context of changing global environmental patterns, it is worth investigating.</p>
<p>Just be objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul K</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12560</link>
		<author>Paul K</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12560</guid>
					<description>Pahbs,
"does it represent an anomaly or does it represent a new pattern?" One hybrid was found three years ago. None since. Trend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pahbs,<br />
&#8220;does it represent an anomaly or does it represent a new pattern?&#8221; One hybrid was found three years ago. None since. Trend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pahbs</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12562</link>
		<author>Pahbs</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-12562</guid>
					<description>Paul K - Yeah, good point. Only one incident and not to be used to conclude or really suggest anything at all. But I do think the hypothesis of expanding geographic ranges and increased likelihood of interacting is plausible and worth investigating. It really is mind-boggling to think about the potential change of species interactions with such rapid changes in environmental conditions. It is a very interesting time to be scientifically alert, especially with the abundance of satellite data available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul K - Yeah, good point. Only one incident and not to be used to conclude or really suggest anything at all. But I do think the hypothesis of expanding geographic ranges and increased likelihood of interacting is plausible and worth investigating. It really is mind-boggling to think about the potential change of species interactions with such rapid changes in environmental conditions. It is a very interesting time to be scientifically alert, especially with the abundance of satellite data available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-14901</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/10/warmings-new-hybrid-the-grolar-bear-or-pizzly/#comment-14901</guid>
					<description>this bear is so cute</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this bear is so cute</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
