Comments on: McCain speech, Part 2: Relying on offsets = Rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/ The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:18:00 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Web Hosting Coupons at midphase http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-45440 Web Hosting Coupons at midphase Sun, 03 May 2009 23:47:11 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-45440 I voted for McCain because of his stance on the war on terror. Frankly, I didn't think that he had a good grasp on the economy. I voted for McCain because of his stance on the war on terror. Frankly, I didn’t think that he had a good grasp on the economy.

]]> By: free options trading course http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-37504 free options trading course Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:41:05 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-37504 Do you guys have a recommendation section, i'd like to suggest some stuff Do you guys have a recommendation section, i’d like to suggest some stuff

]]> By: Bostonlee http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-18866 Bostonlee Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:12:03 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-18866 Ang, xoxo Ang,

xoxo

]]> By: Paul K http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-12531 Paul K Tue, 13 May 2008 04:33:41 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-12531 Offsets are superior to any other CO2 trading mechanism. They are the best unit of trade in Cap & Trade system. They would, in fact, be the currency of the CO2 market. Offsets alone allow maximum consumer participation in the CO2 market being created. Offsets can be created in alternatives, efficiencies, and land use across a wide range of activities micro and macro. Offset are not a tax grab. No auction is required An offset cap/trade law could pass and be signed this year. Offsets are superior to any other CO2 trading mechanism.

They are the best unit of trade in Cap & Trade system. They would, in fact, be the currency of the CO2 market.

Offsets alone allow maximum consumer participation in the CO2 market being created.

Offsets can be created in alternatives, efficiencies, and land use across a wide range of activities micro and macro.

Offset are not a tax grab. No auction is required

An offset cap/trade law could pass and be signed this year.

]]> By: Peter Foley http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-12523 Peter Foley Mon, 12 May 2008 23:39:35 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/05/12/mccain-speech-part-2-relying-on-offsets-rearranging-deck-chairs-on-the-titanic/#comment-12523 If the carbon offsets are totally unnecessary, why would it hurt that they just shuffle imaginary Co2 around. Let the "kids" play while the adults get on with reality. What is sad is that soil chemistry is almost at the same level of voodoo science as climatology is. (Remember the Oxygen shortage in the biosphere?) Local tiled peat ponds are still "burning" during dry spells so they actually lose elevation--thus they get wetter during wet periods. It is counterintuitive that a little plowing actually increases that percentage of organic matter (Carbons for AGW faithful) long term, the trash left on the surface just oxidises (burns) when dry otherwise. Let actually prove carbon-forced AGW prior to starting another layer of tax structures. If the carbon offsets are totally unnecessary, why would it hurt that they just shuffle imaginary Co2 around. Let the “kids” play while the adults get on with reality.
What is sad is that soil chemistry is almost at the same level of voodoo science as climatology is. (Remember the Oxygen shortage in the biosphere?)
Local tiled peat ponds are still “burning” during dry spells so they actually lose elevation–thus they get wetter during wet periods.
It is counterintuitive that a little plowing actually increases that percentage of organic matter (Carbons for AGW faithful) long term, the trash left on the surface just oxidises (burns) when dry otherwise.
Let actually prove carbon-forced AGW prior to starting another layer of tax structures.

]]>