<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senators Inhofe and Sanders weigh in on nukes</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16085</link>
		<author>Zach</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16085</guid>
					<description>Just FYI, Sanders is an independent (socialist to be exact) who caucuses with the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just FYI, Sanders is an independent (socialist to be exact) who caucuses with the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16087</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16087</guid>
					<description>You are very correct!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are very correct!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Killian</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16090</link>
		<author>Earl Killian</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16090</guid>
					<description>It is sad to see the 30% increase line when efficiency could lead to a large decrease instead.  They just don't get it, do they?  Negawatts are 1-2 cents per kWh: the cheapest electricity there is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is sad to see the 30% increase line when efficiency could lead to a large decrease instead.  They just don&#8217;t get it, do they?  Negawatts are 1-2 cents per kWh: the cheapest electricity there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modview</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16093</link>
		<author>modview</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16093</guid>
					<description>Do our Senators really not know how to speak in complete sentences or is this journalistic editing?

Personally, I find it much easier to derive meaning from sentences when they have the minimal constituent parts of subject and verb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do our Senators really not know how to speak in complete sentences or is this journalistic editing?</p>
<p>Personally, I find it much easier to derive meaning from sentences when they have the minimal constituent parts of subject and verb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16105</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16105</guid>
					<description>I am doing live blogging from the Senate committee hearing room where I'm about to be a witness.  I tend to do stream of consciousness, focusing on the key points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am doing live blogging from the Senate committee hearing room where I&#8217;m about to be a witness.  I tend to do stream of consciousness, focusing on the key points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Alt</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16224</link>
		<author>Jay Alt</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/16/senators-inhofe-and-sanders-weigh-in-on-nukes/#comment-16224</guid>
					<description>Links to Real Player witness testimony and .pdf  statements - 

Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety hearing,   &lt;a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&#38;Hearing_ID=0a44d3c6-802a-23ad-46ee-8d6b0b283265" rel="nofollow"&gt;Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Licensing and Relicensing Processes for Nuclear Plants.&lt;/a&gt;
July 16, 2008    EPW Hearing Room - 406 Dirksen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links to Real Player witness testimony and .pdf  statements - </p>
<p>Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Safety hearing,   <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&amp;Hearing_ID=0a44d3c6-802a-23ad-46ee-8d6b0b283265" rel="nofollow">Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Licensing and Relicensing Processes for Nuclear Plants.</a><br />
July 16, 2008    EPW Hearing Room - 406 Dirksen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
