<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The good, the bad and the ugly of the Gang-of-10 drilling deal, Part 2:  Something for nothing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:55:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sikiş</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-93703</link>
		<dc:creator>sikiş</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-93703</guid>
		<description>Very few if any major drilling in these areas for the next 10 years, but then the East Bay is made with the possible exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very few if any major drilling in these areas for the next 10 years, but then the East Bay is made with the possible exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sikiş</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-84301</link>
		<dc:creator>sikiş</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-84301</guid>
		<description>Would it be possible to get the downloads up before 8am Fridays? I&#039;d like to be the show with me for my train ride to work on Friday morning. By Monday, the news is getting stale so I don&#039;t bother downloading it. You guys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be possible to get the downloads up before 8am Fridays? I&#8217;d like to be the show with me for my train ride to work on Friday morning. By Monday, the news is getting stale so I don&#8217;t bother downloading it. You guys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amcik</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-78495</link>
		<dc:creator>amcik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-78495</guid>
		<description>my favorite and best western movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my favorite and best western movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hii</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-55606</link>
		<dc:creator>hii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 12:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-55606</guid>
		<description>Very little if any major drilling will occur for the next 10 years in these areas, and not much after that with the possible exception of the Eastern Gulf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very little if any major drilling will occur for the next 10 years in these areas, and not much after that with the possible exception of the Eastern Gulf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sikis</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-31102</link>
		<dc:creator>sikis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-31102</guid>
		<description>The Gang-of-10 deal leaves out the entire West Coast and half the East Coast, and the other states must opt in. Drilling in the state that seems most excited, Virginia, will almost certainly be vetoed by the Pentagon because the Navy uses the state’s coastal waters for a variety of activities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gang-of-10 deal leaves out the entire West Coast and half the East Coast, and the other states must opt in. Drilling in the state that seems most excited, Virginia, will almost certainly be vetoed by the Pentagon because the Navy uses the state’s coastal waters for a variety of activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erotik</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-30050</link>
		<dc:creator>erotik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-30050</guid>
		<description>So coastal waters with maybe 6 billion barrels of oil will be open for drilling. Very little if any major drilling will occur for the next 10 years in these areas, and not much after that with the possible exception of the Eastern Gulf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So coastal waters with maybe 6 billion barrels of oil will be open for drilling. Very little if any major drilling will occur for the next 10 years in these areas, and not much after that with the possible exception of the Eastern Gulf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillip</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-19554</link>
		<dc:creator>phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-19554</guid>
		<description>Nuclear spent fuel reprocessing is not cost effective. Not even close. The congressional budget office did a cost analysis on this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear spent fuel reprocessing is not cost effective. Not even close. The congressional budget office did a cost analysis on this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-17773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-17773</guid>
		<description>EOR = Enhanced Oil Recovery?

Uses injected chemicals, gases (CO2) or steam/heat to increase oil yields...thanks, wikipedia!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EOR = Enhanced Oil Recovery?</p>
<p>Uses injected chemicals, gases (CO2) or steam/heat to increase oil yields&#8230;thanks, wikipedia!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-17754</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-17754</guid>
		<description>EOR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EOR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-17743</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/17/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-of-the-gang-of-10-drilling-deal-part-2-something-for-nothing/#comment-17743</guid>
		<description>Mauri-

My guess is that Joe will spell ugly with three letters.  However, I was pleased to see that the deal actually has some forethought in starting to train people to build nukes again.  I was actually just thinking about that yesterday, and how the people with experience actually building them are about ready to retire.  That, and welders were hard to come by in the nuclear boom times, so I can&#039;t imagine how hard it will be to find them now.  I still don&#039;t think more than one or two will ever be built, though.

[&lt;em&gt;JR:  I do in fact spell it with three letters, but not CTL.  I spell it EOR.&lt;/em&gt;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mauri-</p>
<p>My guess is that Joe will spell ugly with three letters.  However, I was pleased to see that the deal actually has some forethought in starting to train people to build nukes again.  I was actually just thinking about that yesterday, and how the people with experience actually building them are about ready to retire.  That, and welders were hard to come by in the nuclear boom times, so I can&#8217;t imagine how hard it will be to find them now.  I still don&#8217;t think more than one or two will ever be built, though.</p>
<p>[<em>JR:  I do in fact spell it with three letters, but not CTL.  I spell it EOR.</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
