http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/18/gang-of-10-part-25-house-gop-says-drill-here-drill-now-compromise-later/ The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:05:30 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/18/gang-of-10-part-25-house-gop-says-drill-here-drill-now-compromise-later/#comment-31111 sikiş Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:59:51 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/18/gang-of-10-part-25-house-gop-says-drill-here-drill-now-compromise-later/#comment-31111 An energy package that would expand offshore drilling will come to the House floor in September, but it will be bundled with provisions that Republicans oppose, aides to Pelosi confirmed. An energy package that would expand offshore drilling will come to the House floor in September, but it will be bundled with provisions that Republicans oppose, aides to Pelosi confirmed.

]]> http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/18/gang-of-10-part-25-house-gop-says-drill-here-drill-now-compromise-later/#comment-28860 shop Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:53:47 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/18/gang-of-10-part-25-house-gop-says-drill-here-drill-now-compromise-later/#comment-28860 Republicans want the House to vote on legislation that would end a decades-long ban on energy drilling on the east and west coasts. Pelosi has rejected that idea, but recently signaled that she might move legislation to open up smaller areas to drilling. Republicans want the House to vote on legislation that would end a decades-long ban on energy drilling on the east and west coasts. Pelosi has rejected that idea, but recently signaled that she might move legislation to open up smaller areas to drilling.

]]> http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/18/gang-of-10-part-25-house-gop-says-drill-here-drill-now-compromise-later/#comment-17753 David B. Benson Tue, 19 Aug 2008 02:25:33 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/18/gang-of-10-part-25-house-gop-says-drill-here-drill-now-compromise-later/#comment-17753 Joe --- In answer to your final que3ation, the answer is, IMO, many upon many. :-( Joe — In answer to your final que3ation, the answer is, IMO, many upon many.

]]>