<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why future Katrinas and Gustavs will be MUCH worse, Part 2</title>
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18390</link>
		<author>David B. Benson</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18390</guid>
					<description>By 2050 the sea level will be about 40 cm higher and so the 'beach' will be further inland, with the barrier islands tending to be submerged.

Worser and worser...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By 2050 the sea level will be about 40 cm higher and so the &#8216;beach&#8217; will be further inland, with the barrier islands tending to be submerged.</p>
<p>Worser and worser&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18395</link>
		<author>David B. Benson</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18395</guid>
					<description>I meant 20--40 cm higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant 20&#8211;40 cm higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18402</link>
		<author>paulm</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 03:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18402</guid>
					<description>...if we don’t reverse emissions trends soon, then Category 4 and 5 storms smashing into the Gulf coast seem likely to become a rather common in the second half of this century...

I think we are seeing this start to happen now...not in the second half of the century! Many of my family live in the Caribbean and they are becoming very nervous recently!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;if we don’t reverse emissions trends soon, then Category 4 and 5 storms smashing into the Gulf coast seem likely to become a rather common in the second half of this century&#8230;</p>
<p>I think we are seeing this start to happen now&#8230;not in the second half of the century! Many of my family live in the Caribbean and they are becoming very nervous recently!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpauli</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18410</link>
		<author>rpauli</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18410</guid>
					<description>Consider that the calendar of storms may expand with water warming.  Rarely appearing in winter months, but that may change.

Did I recall that the further North a hurricane tracks, the faster it goes?  True?   A 1938 hurricane hit New England was tracking forward at 70 mph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider that the calendar of storms may expand with water warming.  Rarely appearing in winter months, but that may change.</p>
<p>Did I recall that the further North a hurricane tracks, the faster it goes?  True?   A 1938 hurricane hit New England was tracking forward at 70 mph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mauri pelto</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18418</link>
		<author>mauri pelto</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18418</guid>
					<description>If we look at the three main criteria for hurricane formation and survival.
A) Water temperature-fertilizer
B) Cyclonic systems-seeds
C) Wind shear-lack of water
It is not clear what the impact of the latter two is in a warmer world.  The first clearly as you note increases.  This increases the likelihood of an existing storm to be stronger, however, does it make more?  That depends as much as on B and C, we just are not as sure.
NOAA has a term Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential, as they describe the rapid intensification of a number of recent storms beyond expectations as they pass over particularly warm water indicates this is a more powerful mechanism than has been realized.  And as you note Joe, strongly supports the role of warmer SST overall in helping foster stronger tropical cyclones. 
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/cyclone/data/intro.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we look at the three main criteria for hurricane formation and survival.<br />
A) Water temperature-fertilizer<br />
B) Cyclonic systems-seeds<br />
C) Wind shear-lack of water<br />
It is not clear what the impact of the latter two is in a warmer world.  The first clearly as you note increases.  This increases the likelihood of an existing storm to be stronger, however, does it make more?  That depends as much as on B and C, we just are not as sure.<br />
NOAA has a term Tropical Cyclone Heat Potential, as they describe the rapid intensification of a number of recent storms beyond expectations as they pass over particularly warm water indicates this is a more powerful mechanism than has been realized.  And as you note Joe, strongly supports the role of warmer SST overall in helping foster stronger tropical cyclones.<br />
<a href="http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/cyclone/data/intro.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/cyclone/data/intro.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18419</link>
		<author>paulm</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18419</guid>
					<description>The storms recently have had very unpredictable paths. 

Could climate change have anything to do with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The storms recently have had very unpredictable paths. </p>
<p>Could climate change have anything to do with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18428</link>
		<author>David B. Benson</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18428</guid>
					<description>Joe --- These two parts were helpfully informative.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe &#8212; These two parts were helpfully informative.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Alt</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18444</link>
		<author>Jay Alt</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/01/why-future-katrinas-and-gustavs-will-be-much-worse-part-2/#comment-18444</guid>
					<description>Joe points out that a permanent el Nino would damp Atlantic hurricane activity yet be a planetary disaster.  There is a related 'tradeoff' that doesn't get enough attention.  

'Confusionists' often hype the benefits of medieval warming, to Europe.  That was real but regional and asynchronous.  But in that same time frame Native Americans got the short end of the stick. Decades-long megadroughts destroyed the Mississippian Culture around Cahokia, the Anasazi in the SW and others.  And East Africa was drier than recently, the last thing those suffering people need now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe points out that a permanent el Nino would damp Atlantic hurricane activity yet be a planetary disaster.  There is a related &#8216;tradeoff&#8217; that doesn&#8217;t get enough attention.  </p>
<p>&#8216;Confusionists&#8217; often hype the benefits of medieval warming, to Europe.  That was real but regional and asynchronous.  But in that same time frame Native Americans got the short end of the stick. Decades-long megadroughts destroyed the Mississippian Culture around Cahokia, the Anasazi in the SW and others.  And East Africa was drier than recently, the last thing those suffering people need now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
