Comments on: The savings from cutting California’s carbon “outweigh the costs” http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/ The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics Sun, 08 Nov 2009 12:18:00 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: sex hikayeler http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-30653 sex hikayeler Wed, 25 Feb 2009 02:53:53 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-30653 ensest hikayeler ensest hikayeler

]]> By: büyütücü http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-28641 büyütücü Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:00:16 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-28641 coal today; South Carolina comes to mind. So to some extent, using modern rather than fossil carbon is possible. The problem is that the coal reacots tend to be congregated in but a few regions while growing biomass requires extensively spread-out operations. Much of the resulting biomass is then stranded by excessive transportation costs so it makes more sense to simply bury it there. coal today; South Carolina comes to mind. So to some extent, using modern rather than fossil carbon is possible. The problem is that the coal reacots tend to be congregated in but a few regions while growing biomass requires extensively spread-out operations. Much of the resulting biomass is then stranded by excessive transportation costs so it makes more sense to simply bury it there.

]]> By: shop http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-27204 shop Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:47:44 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-27204 There were two economic estimates prepared, one using CARB’s Environmental Dynamic Revenue Assessment Model (E-DRAM), and another done by U.C. Berkeley: Berkeley Energy and Resources (BEAR) model. The results were broadly similar. Both started with a Business As Usual (BAU) forecast, and then analyzed how that forecast would change in response to individual recommendations. There were two economic estimates prepared, one using CARB’s Environmental Dynamic Revenue Assessment Model (E-DRAM), and another done by U.C. Berkeley: Berkeley Energy and Resources (BEAR) model. The results were broadly similar. Both started with a Business As Usual (BAU) forecast, and then analyzed how that forecast would change in response to individual recommendations.

]]> By: Complete Savings http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-25655 Complete Savings Thu, 25 Dec 2008 12:34:21 +0000 http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/23/the-savings-from-cutting-californias-carbon-outweigh-the-costs/#comment-25655 Mighty good number of facts here. But wherever I see, whichever country it is, fact finding and report writing far outweigh actual implementation. I really wonder if anything will come off the already lost battle against climate change. Rhea. Mighty good number of facts here. But wherever I see, whichever country it is, fact finding and report writing far outweigh actual implementation. I really wonder if anything will come off the already lost battle against climate change.

Rhea.

]]>