<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. geothermal is hot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:39:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Earl Killian</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19963</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Killian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19963</guid>
		<description>Geothermal just got hotter:
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2027

The USGS said yesterday,
&lt;blockquote&gt;The results of this assessment show that the United States has an estimated 9,057 Megawatts-electric (MWe) of power generation potential from domestic, conventional, identified geothermal systems, 30,033 MWe of power generation potential from conventional, undiscovered geothermal resources, and 517,800 MWe of power generation potential from unconventional (high temperature, low permeability) Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) resources.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That is enough power to shut down all US coal plants! (312,956 MWe in 2006)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geothermal just got hotter:<br />
<a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2027" rel="nofollow">http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2027</a></p>
<p>The USGS said yesterday,</p>
<blockquote><p>The results of this assessment show that the United States has an estimated 9,057 Megawatts-electric (MWe) of power generation potential from domestic, conventional, identified geothermal systems, 30,033 MWe of power generation potential from conventional, undiscovered geothermal resources, and 517,800 MWe of power generation potential from unconventional (high temperature, low permeability) Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) resources.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is enough power to shut down all US coal plants! (312,956 MWe in 2006)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Killian</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19789</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Killian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19789</guid>
		<description>Bob Wallace, if Cyril means what I think he means, it is sometimes called thermal spallation.  The basic idea is described here: http://web.mit.edu/tester/hydrothermal_flames.html
You might find slides 47-51 of
http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/seminar/docs/2007/ea_seminar_mar_1.ppt
also useful.
The MIT report on the future of geothermal
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/future_geothermal.html
is useful in general, but leaves out advanced drilling techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Wallace, if Cyril means what I think he means, it is sometimes called thermal spallation.  The basic idea is described here: <a href="http://web.mit.edu/tester/hydrothermal_flames.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.mit.edu/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>tester/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>hydrothermal_flames.html</a><br />
You might find slides 47-51 of<br />
<a href="http://www.nrel.gov/analysis/seminar/docs/2007/ea_seminar_mar_1.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://www.nrel.gov/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>analysis/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>seminar/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>docs/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2007/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>ea_seminar_mar_1.ppt</a><br />
also useful.<br />
The MIT report on the future of geothermal<br />
<a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/future_geothermal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www1.eere.energy.gov/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>geothermal/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>future_geothermal.html</a><br />
is useful in general, but leaves out advanced drilling techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dill Weed</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19786</link>
		<dc:creator>Dill Weed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19786</guid>
		<description>Drill, Baby, Drill!!

Word.


- Dill Weed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drill, Baby, Drill!!</p>
<p>Word.</p>
<p>- Dill Weed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19781</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19781</guid>
		<description>&quot;hydrogen combustion fracturing&quot;

Would you please flesh that out a bit?  I did the google and found nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;hydrogen combustion fracturing&#8221;</p>
<p>Would you please flesh that out a bit?  I did the google and found nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyril R.</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19775</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19775</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s some interesting work going on about developing non-drillbit technology, such as hydrogen combustion fracturing, which should make drilling deep really easy, fast, and cheap.

Keeping my fingers crossed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s some interesting work going on about developing non-drillbit technology, such as hydrogen combustion fracturing, which should make drilling deep really easy, fast, and cheap.</p>
<p>Keeping my fingers crossed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19767</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19767</guid>
		<description>I think drill down geothermal requires larger diameter holes than can be made with oil drilling rigs.  Seems I read that development is being slowed by the lack of appropriate equipment.

Drill down/inject water/harvest steam is an ideal solution as it can be installed close to point of use in much of the US.  Produces 24/7 and wouldn&#039;t require massive HVDC transmission line installation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think drill down geothermal requires larger diameter holes than can be made with oil drilling rigs.  Seems I read that development is being slowed by the lack of appropriate equipment.</p>
<p>Drill down/inject water/harvest steam is an ideal solution as it can be installed close to point of use in much of the US.  Produces 24/7 and wouldn&#8217;t require massive HVDC transmission line installation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomG</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19766</link>
		<dc:creator>TomG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 02:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19766</guid>
		<description>Nothing is forever, but geothermal has more future than oil.
Drill, baby, drill...for heat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing is forever, but geothermal has more future than oil.<br />
Drill, baby, drill&#8230;for heat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19765</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19765</guid>
		<description>And here is a story about two men who made the attempt this last summer to go skim up algae blooms:

http://www.king5.com/business/stories/NW_031808ENB_algae_biodiesel_KC.300b76b.html

or at least that was what they wanted to try...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here is a story about two men who made the attempt this last summer to go skim up algae blooms:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.king5.com/business/stories/NW_031808ENB_algae_biodiesel_KC.300b76b.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.king5.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>business/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>stories/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>NW_031808ENB_algae_biodiesel_KC.300b76b.html</a></p>
<p>or at least that was what they wanted to try&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19764</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19764</guid>
		<description>Far from geothermal, but I found

&quot;Algae in excess - harvesting for Life&quot;:

http://www5.o.lst.se/projekt/eulife-algae/PDF/EUlifealgae_eng.pdf

quite interesting as a way to clean up some &#039;dead spots&#039;.  If done on a large enough scale, might possibly provide a source of profitable energy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far from geothermal, but I found</p>
<p>&#8220;Algae in excess &#8211; harvesting for Life&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www5.o.lst.se/projekt/eulife-algae/PDF/EUlifealgae_eng.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www5.o.lst.se/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>projekt/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>eulife-algae/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>PDF/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>EUlifealgae_eng.pdf</a></p>
<p>quite interesting as a way to clean up some &#8216;dead spots&#8217;.  If done on a large enough scale, might possibly provide a source of profitable energy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wood</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19762</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/09/27/us-geothermal-is-hot/#comment-19762</guid>
		<description>We should be using all of the massive high powered oil drilling rigs around for instead developing geothermal resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should be using all of the massive high powered oil drilling rigs around for instead developing geothermal resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
