<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who will be the biggest obstacle to climate action in the next decade &#8212; China, Russia, India, or us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:48:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cyril R.</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20695</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20695</guid>
		<description>If I know anything about the Chinese government, then they will look intensively at other countries&#039; CO2 regulation programmes, see what appears to work and what doesn&#039;t, then implement it small scale (perhaps in some major cities first), learn from that, then go to the national level.

In the meanwhile, no-brainer win-wins are being implemented quickly, like demand side energy efficiency, much more efficient coal plants etc. The big stuff, though, like carbon trading/taxing will have to wait till major consumers of China - like the US and Europe - have their mind clearly set on something. Then, my guess is China will follow suit, one of the main reasons being to please (or not to upset) their Western consumers.

That may be not good enough, you might say, but better than the US which is doing close to nothing in the grand scheme of things, and the Chinese can implement any program really FAST.

It is why I have argued before, that the US and Europe have to set hard targets and decide quickly on programmes and their implementation. Otherwise, we&#039;ll all get caught in a global game of accusations, wasting our precious time pointing the finger. This snowball requires a rather big push to get rolling, but get rolling it must, even though it may cost those with initiative a bit in errors that may be pricey. In all fairness, this is the risk we need to take.

End of rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I know anything about the Chinese government, then they will look intensively at other countries&#8217; CO2 regulation programmes, see what appears to work and what doesn&#8217;t, then implement it small scale (perhaps in some major cities first), learn from that, then go to the national level.</p>
<p>In the meanwhile, no-brainer win-wins are being implemented quickly, like demand side energy efficiency, much more efficient coal plants etc. The big stuff, though, like carbon trading/taxing will have to wait till major consumers of China &#8211; like the US and Europe &#8211; have their mind clearly set on something. Then, my guess is China will follow suit, one of the main reasons being to please (or not to upset) their Western consumers.</p>
<p>That may be not good enough, you might say, but better than the US which is doing close to nothing in the grand scheme of things, and the Chinese can implement any program really FAST.</p>
<p>It is why I have argued before, that the US and Europe have to set hard targets and decide quickly on programmes and their implementation. Otherwise, we&#8217;ll all get caught in a global game of accusations, wasting our precious time pointing the finger. This snowball requires a rather big push to get rolling, but get rolling it must, even though it may cost those with initiative a bit in errors that may be pricey. In all fairness, this is the risk we need to take.</p>
<p>End of rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20595</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20595</guid>
		<description>John Mashey --- Thank you.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Mashey &#8212; Thank you.  <img src='http://climateprogress.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Haas</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20560</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Haas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20560</guid>
		<description>Joe,
two things are clear:
a) there are important emission reduction opportunities in India, and we&#039;ll need to seize them if we are to limit global warming to tolerable levels.\
b) India is still very poor and by and large not responsible for the problem. Its development priorities are justifiably very immediate.

The way out of this dilemma is a generous offer from the North to pay for emission reductions in India. Otherwise we would prove Lomborg right. This is the avenue that the Bali Action Plan indicates and that we must now vigorously pursue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,<br />
two things are clear:<br />
a) there are important emission reduction opportunities in India, and we&#8217;ll need to seize them if we are to limit global warming to tolerable levels.\<br />
b) India is still very poor and by and large not responsible for the problem. Its development priorities are justifiably very immediate.</p>
<p>The way out of this dilemma is a generous offer from the North to pay for emission reductions in India. Otherwise we would prove Lomborg right. This is the avenue that the Bali Action Plan indicates and that we must now vigorously pursue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mashey</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20559</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mashey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20559</guid>
		<description>David:
Prof.Klare discussed:

- some  history of oil &amp; WW II (Japan -&gt;Dutch East Indies for oil,  with preemptive strike on Pearl Harbor; Germany -&gt; southern attack in USSR for oil; US provided 7/8 of the oil used by Allies; US Saudi  agreement via FDR, as it was  clear US would not be able to be top producer forever)

- mid-East, Caucasus, Africa

- Rapidly-rising demand from India and China

- Russian determination to use oil/gas as  major  political weapon  (in his book, Klare notes, p 92-93, that during the 1990s, Putin got a PhD from the St. Petersburg Mining Institute, and argues strongly that the government should  set priorities for the oil industry (i.e., not privatization).

- General concern over the number and complexity of potential flashpoints over energy supplies, and investment in military resources as opposed to sustainable energy supplies + climate issues.

- I.e., this is primarily a political science/history view about the dangers from  that side, but ends  with positive actions that should taken for both security and climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David:<br />
Prof.Klare discussed:</p>
<p>- some  history of oil &amp; WW II (Japan -&gt;Dutch East Indies for oil,  with preemptive strike on Pearl Harbor; Germany -&gt; southern attack in USSR for oil; US provided 7/8 of the oil used by Allies; US Saudi  agreement via FDR, as it was  clear US would not be able to be top producer forever)</p>
<p>- mid-East, Caucasus, Africa</p>
<p>- Rapidly-rising demand from India and China</p>
<p>- Russian determination to use oil/gas as  major  political weapon  (in his book, Klare notes, p 92-93, that during the 1990s, Putin got a PhD from the St. Petersburg Mining Institute, and argues strongly that the government should  set priorities for the oil industry (i.e., not privatization).</p>
<p>- General concern over the number and complexity of potential flashpoints over energy supplies, and investment in military resources as opposed to sustainable energy supplies + climate issues.</p>
<p>- I.e., this is primarily a political science/history view about the dangers from  that side, but ends  with positive actions that should taken for both security and climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20556</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20556</guid>
		<description>rpaull --- Also The Tragedy of the Commons:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rpaull &#8212; Also The Tragedy of the Commons:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpauli</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20555</link>
		<dc:creator>rpauli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20555</guid>
		<description>This is the diplomatic version of the prisoner&#039;s dilemma from game theory.

Will all states co-operate for the good of all, or betray to gain momentary economic advantage?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the diplomatic version of the prisoner&#8217;s dilemma from game theory.</p>
<p>Will all states co-operate for the good of all, or betray to gain momentary economic advantage?</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20553</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20553</guid>
		<description>Joe Romm --- All of the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Romm &#8212; All of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20551</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20551</guid>
		<description>anon - I didn&#039;t find any list but forestry in the tropics is big for CO2 (Brazil and Indonesia)
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/deforestation-the-hidden-cause-of-global-warming-448734.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon &#8211; I didn&#8217;t find any list but forestry in the tropics is big for CO2 (Brazil and Indonesia)<br />
<a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/deforestation-the-hidden-cause-of-global-warming-448734.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>environment/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>climate-change/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>deforestation-the-hidden-cause-of-global-warming-448734.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20549</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20549</guid>
		<description>John Mashey  ---- Briefly, what did Prof. Klare say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Mashey  &#8212;- Briefly, what did Prof. Klare say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20547</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/14/who-will-be-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action-in-the-next-decade-china-russia-india-or-us/#comment-20547</guid>
		<description>Can someone provide a link to an authoritative current ranking of the top greenhouse gas emitters - including through deforestation? 

I have looked on google, and I haven&#039;t been able to find one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone provide a link to an authoritative current ranking of the top greenhouse gas emitters &#8211; including through deforestation? </p>
<p>I have looked on google, and I haven&#8217;t been able to find one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
