<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economy doesn&#8217;t trump climate:  EU sticks by GHG plan, UK goes for 80% cut.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:48:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay Alt</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20698</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Alt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20698</guid>
		<description>Last week the EU adopted the Davies amendment.  They will setup a €10 billion euro fund for CCS demo projects -

http://www.theparliament.com/latestnews/news-article/newsarticle/meps-call-for-ccs-technology-in-eu-power-plants-by-2015/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week the EU adopted the Davies amendment.  They will setup a €10 billion euro fund for CCS demo projects -</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theparliament.com/latestnews/news-article/newsarticle/meps-call-for-ccs-technology-in-eu-power-plants-by-2015/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theparliament.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>latestnews/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>news-article/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>newsarticle/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>meps-call-for-ccs-technology-in-eu-power-plants-by-2015/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20666</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20666</guid>
		<description>Who is going to remember what some long forgotten politician said 42 years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is going to remember what some long forgotten politician said 42 years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20661</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20661</guid>
		<description>I am very pleased that Ed Miliband is keeping climate change on the agenda and setting tough targets, but the BBC took great glee in reporting that, simultaneously, Brown was calling for cheaper petrol:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7674739.stm

Quite how we reduce emissions by 80% I have no idea, but I guess the current Labour government feel pretty safe about it. After all, does anyone remember what committments Harold Wilson&#039;s government of 1964 made and is anyone holding him to account today? (Hint - he died 13 years ago so probably not...)

On another subject, has anyone heard of black silicon? It is a PV technology that claims up to 40% efficiency. It would be a real shame to deploy conventional PV panels in vast quantities then find that they could have been made 4x as efficient at no extra cost.

http://www.sionyx.com/advantage.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very pleased that Ed Miliband is keeping climate change on the agenda and setting tough targets, but the BBC took great glee in reporting that, simultaneously, Brown was calling for cheaper petrol:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7674739.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7674739.stm</a></p>
<p>Quite how we reduce emissions by 80% I have no idea, but I guess the current Labour government feel pretty safe about it. After all, does anyone remember what committments Harold Wilson&#8217;s government of 1964 made and is anyone holding him to account today? (Hint &#8211; he died 13 years ago so probably not&#8230;)</p>
<p>On another subject, has anyone heard of black silicon? It is a PV technology that claims up to 40% efficiency. It would be a real shame to deploy conventional PV panels in vast quantities then find that they could have been made 4x as efficient at no extra cost.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sionyx.com/advantage.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.sionyx.com/advantage.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20656</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20656</guid>
		<description>Well, now, once again, ClimateProgress is leaving cookies for name and e-mail address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now, once again, ClimateProgress is leaving cookies for name and e-mail address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20655</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20655</guid>
		<description>But for about 90 minutes in Wisconsin Falls, Wisconsin, at one gas station the price was just $0.349 per gallon.

Joe Romm -- ClimateProgress now requires me to enter my name and email address everytime.  It doesn&#039;t seem to be setting a cookie anymore. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But for about 90 minutes in Wisconsin Falls, Wisconsin, at one gas station the price was just $0.349 per gallon.</p>
<p>Joe Romm &#8212; ClimateProgress now requires me to enter my name and email address everytime.  It doesn&#8217;t seem to be setting a cookie anymore. <img src='http://climateprogress.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg N</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20654</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/16/economy-doesnt-trump-climate-eu-sticks-by-ghg-plan-uk-goes-for-80-cut/#comment-20654</guid>
		<description>The UK might be setting a better target, but at another press conference across town the Prime Minister was urging oil companies to cut petrol prices at the pump.

The usual story of ambitious words and counterproductive actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK might be setting a better target, but at another press conference across town the Prime Minister was urging oil companies to cut petrol prices at the pump.</p>
<p>The usual story of ambitious words and counterproductive actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
