<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interactive Map: CO2 emissions by state per capita</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:34:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ClaudeB</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21040</link>
		<dc:creator>ClaudeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21040</guid>
		<description>The CO2 emissions per capita data is interesting, but I was surprised by some numbers after I played with the spreadsheet for a few minutes. Using a &quot;Kyoto-style&quot; calculation (emissions growth over the 1990 numbers), DC still rates in first place (the district actually decreased its CO2 emissions by 11.5% from 1990 to 2005), followed by Delaware (+0.3%), New York and Massachussetts (tied at +1.4%) and... Louisiana (+1.7%)! 

Using this metric, West Virginia rates 8th in the US with an increase of 6.1%, which is three times less than the US average of +19.2%. Yes the home of coal is among the biggest emitter per capita, but at least they seem to be doing something to slow the growth of CO2 emissions. 

Which brings me to some of the &quot;10 cleanest states&quot;. Yes, 11 t per capita is good, but some of these states have not been that good at limiting the growth of their emissions between 1990 and 2005: Idaho (+39.6%) or Oregon (+38.7%), are among the 10 worst as far as controlling emissions is concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CO2 emissions per capita data is interesting, but I was surprised by some numbers after I played with the spreadsheet for a few minutes. Using a &#8220;Kyoto-style&#8221; calculation (emissions growth over the 1990 numbers), DC still rates in first place (the district actually decreased its CO2 emissions by 11.5% from 1990 to 2005), followed by Delaware (+0.3%), New York and Massachussetts (tied at +1.4%) and&#8230; Louisiana (+1.7%)! </p>
<p>Using this metric, West Virginia rates 8th in the US with an increase of 6.1%, which is three times less than the US average of +19.2%. Yes the home of coal is among the biggest emitter per capita, but at least they seem to be doing something to slow the growth of CO2 emissions. </p>
<p>Which brings me to some of the &#8220;10 cleanest states&#8221;. Yes, 11 t per capita is good, but some of these states have not been that good at limiting the growth of their emissions between 1990 and 2005: Idaho (+39.6%) or Oregon (+38.7%), are among the 10 worst as far as controlling emissions is concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21028</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21028</guid>
		<description>DBB - Thanks. It shows that this way of calculating per-capita emissions is a bit meaningless. The CO2 for that big juicy steak should be attributed to the stockbroker in New York that ate it, not the farmer that grew it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DBB &#8211; Thanks. It shows that this way of calculating per-capita emissions is a bit meaningless. The CO2 for that big juicy steak should be attributed to the stockbroker in New York that ate it, not the farmer that grew it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21025</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21025</guid>
		<description>alex  --- Look under manufactoring and mining in

http://www.netstate.com/economy/wy_economy.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alex  &#8212; Look under manufactoring and mining in</p>
<p><a href="http://www.netstate.com/economy/wy_economy.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.netstate.com/economy/wy_economy.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21018</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21018</guid>
		<description>Some of the statistics are, shall we say, surprising.

How on earth do Wyoming citizens generate 124 tonnes of CO2 a year?

From previous research I understood Texas to have both the highest total CO2 and the highest per-capita CO2, yet it comes out looking quite good on your chart.

Alaska is high on the list. Is that why Palin isn&#039;t big on GW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the statistics are, shall we say, surprising.</p>
<p>How on earth do Wyoming citizens generate 124 tonnes of CO2 a year?</p>
<p>From previous research I understood Texas to have both the highest total CO2 and the highest per-capita CO2, yet it comes out looking quite good on your chart.</p>
<p>Alaska is high on the list. Is that why Palin isn&#8217;t big on GW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick C</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21002</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-21002</guid>
		<description>Wow, my state of Texas even beat California in annual CO2 emissions. It beat my birth state of New Jersey by 5 times! Joe is part of the CO2 emissions from the energy that goes into refined oil products that the other states then consume? If the energy costs were spread proportionally to the states that use Texas oil and gas would the CO2 emissions shift?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, my state of Texas even beat California in annual CO2 emissions. It beat my birth state of New Jersey by 5 times! Joe is part of the CO2 emissions from the energy that goes into refined oil products that the other states then consume? If the energy costs were spread proportionally to the states that use Texas oil and gas would the CO2 emissions shift?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-20996</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/10/24/interactive-map-co2-emissions-by-state-per-capita/#comment-20996</guid>
		<description>I have a question about how these emissions were calculated. If state x manufactures concrete, and they export 5% of it to state y, how are the emissions from the manufacturing of that concrete allocated? Do they all goto state x, or do 5% of them goto state y?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question about how these emissions were calculated. If state x manufactures concrete, and they export 5% of it to state y, how are the emissions from the manufacturing of that concrete allocated? Do they all goto state x, or do 5% of them goto state y?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
