<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Draft auto bailout bill plus Ford and GM can meet the CA standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:24:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24467</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24467</guid>
		<description>The only reason why I saw any benefit to the bailout was if Congress could control how Detroit behaves in manners that directly relate to the environment and producing energy efficient cars in a sustainable way.  If the plan does not pass, I think the government will loose out on extra leverage that they might otherwise have.  

There are interesting perspectives out there about using the bailout money to build fueling stations for natural gas or electricity or to use the money to buy Tesla.  We need to think outside the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason why I saw any benefit to the bailout was if Congress could control how Detroit behaves in manners that directly relate to the environment and producing energy efficient cars in a sustainable way.  If the plan does not pass, I think the government will loose out on extra leverage that they might otherwise have.  </p>
<p>There are interesting perspectives out there about using the bailout money to build fueling stations for natural gas or electricity or to use the money to buy Tesla.  We need to think outside the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24157</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24157</guid>
		<description>All efficiency improvements are welcome, but can we aim even higher?  Amory Lovins at www.RMI.org has been preaching efficiency and renewables for 30 years, land has catalogued the ways to end oil.  (Yes, he also preached hydrogen fuel cells, but he has backed away from that.  Anybody can make a mistake.)

He spells out the whole plan at the website for his book:   www.oilendgame.com . The whole thing is available for free, and worth a look.

His main goal now is to make cars lighter with carbon fiber.  Let&#039;s start with buses and taxis, where you get the most bang for your buck  (or in the case of bailouts, our tax bucks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All efficiency improvements are welcome, but can we aim even higher?  Amory Lovins at <a href="http://www.RMI.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.RMI.org</a> has been preaching efficiency and renewables for 30 years, land has catalogued the ways to end oil.  (Yes, he also preached hydrogen fuel cells, but he has backed away from that.  Anybody can make a mistake.)</p>
<p>He spells out the whole plan at the website for his book:   <a href="http://www.oilendgame.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.oilendgame.com</a> . The whole thing is available for free, and worth a look.</p>
<p>His main goal now is to make cars lighter with carbon fiber.  Let&#8217;s start with buses and taxis, where you get the most bang for your buck  (or in the case of bailouts, our tax bucks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bauer</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24156</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 01:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24156</guid>
		<description>“Any bailout must require the companies to end their opposition to California’s standards and meet higher federal fuel economy and emission standards...&quot;

Anyone know if Congress required the Big 3 to drop their lawsuits against CA and other states?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Any bailout must require the companies to end their opposition to California’s standards and meet higher federal fuel economy and emission standards&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone know if Congress required the Big 3 to drop their lawsuits against CA and other states?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llewelly</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24149</link>
		<dc:creator>llewelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/08/draft-auto-bailout-bill-plus-ford-and-gm-can-meet-the-ca-standard/#comment-24149</guid>
		<description>well this is good news. Maybe there&#039;s a future for GM and Ford after all. Maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well this is good news. Maybe there&#8217;s a future for GM and Ford after all. Maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
