<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama does pick Steven Chu for Energy Secretary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:20:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24431</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24431</guid>
		<description>Jon:

Hmm, I thought my semi-humorous, slightly self-deprecating tone here was obvious, sort of.  Guess not.

Self-obsessed?  Gosh, isn&#039;t that a job requirement for a full-time blogger?

Gloating?  What is there to gloat over -- we&#039;re headed toward 1000 ppm?

Grandstanding?  &quot;To perform ostentatiously so as to impress an audience.&quot;  I could have sworn that was on the job description too.

I&#039;ll try to be meeker in the future despite the inevitable fall off in readership that will result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon:</p>
<p>Hmm, I thought my semi-humorous, slightly self-deprecating tone here was obvious, sort of.  Guess not.</p>
<p>Self-obsessed?  Gosh, isn&#8217;t that a job requirement for a full-time blogger?</p>
<p>Gloating?  What is there to gloat over &#8212; we&#8217;re headed toward 1000 ppm?</p>
<p>Grandstanding?  &#8220;To perform ostentatiously so as to impress an audience.&#8221;  I could have sworn that was on the job description too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to be meeker in the future despite the inevitable fall off in readership that will result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24429</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24429</guid>
		<description>Why go after Joe, the webmaster.   He explains in the first paragraph why he got it before the msm.   As for other stuff on this website, it makes for a better website when there is a little edge to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why go after Joe, the webmaster.   He explains in the first paragraph why he got it before the msm.   As for other stuff on this website, it makes for a better website when there is a little edge to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24419</link>
		<dc:creator>paulm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24419</guid>
		<description>Hey, give the guy a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, give the guy a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24415</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24415</guid>
		<description>Please get over yourself.  I had read about Chu on no less than five other sites before you posted it.  Of course blogs beat the MSM to these stories--that&#039;s how it works across the board (for reasons you mentioned).   I enjoy the actual energy and climate analysis that you do on this site, but the self-obsessed gloating and grandstanding that you can&#039;t seem to get over nearly keeps me from coming back.  Nearly.  We beg you--stick to the analysis and, for the sake of the cause, get over the &quot;Joe Romm show.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please get over yourself.  I had read about Chu on no less than five other sites before you posted it.  Of course blogs beat the MSM to these stories&#8211;that&#8217;s how it works across the board (for reasons you mentioned).   I enjoy the actual energy and climate analysis that you do on this site, but the self-obsessed gloating and grandstanding that you can&#8217;t seem to get over nearly keeps me from coming back.  Nearly.  We beg you&#8211;stick to the analysis and, for the sake of the cause, get over the &#8220;Joe Romm show.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24412</link>
		<dc:creator>paulm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24412</guid>
		<description>The guy is a genius!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy is a genius!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llewelly</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24406</link>
		<dc:creator>llewelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24406</guid>
		<description>As an aside, it seems Obama&#039;s picks are very good news for energy and environment, consisting mostly of people who have a record of understanding and promoting sane polices. However, his picks are mostly bad news for the financial crisis, as his finance-related picks consist entirely of people who helped cause the crisis in the first place. Presidents are often (and often rightfully) maligned for focusing on the short term and failing to address long-term problems. Obama seems to be the other way around. (Of course the scale of my comparison is probably somewhat off; the financial crisis seems unlikely to present us with risks comparable in magnitude to the risks of global warming.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, it seems Obama&#8217;s picks are very good news for energy and environment, consisting mostly of people who have a record of understanding and promoting sane polices. However, his picks are mostly bad news for the financial crisis, as his finance-related picks consist entirely of people who helped cause the crisis in the first place. Presidents are often (and often rightfully) maligned for focusing on the short term and failing to address long-term problems. Obama seems to be the other way around. (Of course the scale of my comparison is probably somewhat off; the financial crisis seems unlikely to present us with risks comparable in magnitude to the risks of global warming.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llewelly</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24405</link>
		<dc:creator>llewelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24405</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Such is the advantage of not actually requiring multiple confirming sources for blog posts and, of course, the ability to put a question mark in the headline.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
There&#039;s plenty of evidence many newspaper reporters often don&#039;t bother with &quot;multiple confirming sources&quot; - even &quot;sources that aren&#039;t obviously full of pig excrement&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Such is the advantage of not actually requiring multiple confirming sources for blog posts and, of course, the ability to put a question mark in the headline.
</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s plenty of evidence many newspaper reporters often don&#8217;t bother with &#8220;multiple confirming sources&#8221; &#8211; even &#8220;sources that aren&#8217;t obviously full of pig excrement&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.greenpoliticsnj.com</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24393</link>
		<dc:creator>www.greenpoliticsnj.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24393</guid>
		<description>I hope Obama&#039;s picks are also shrewd political operators.... because lacking that will undermine all the intelligence in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Obama&#8217;s picks are also shrewd political operators&#8230;. because lacking that will undermine all the intelligence in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonsi</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24389</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24389</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the post you referenced, James, though it would be nice if you posted the peer reviewed journal article from which it is based.  I am guessing Lyman et al. 2006 (doi:10.1029/2006GL027033) which was subsequently explained by instrument bias from the same researchers (Lyman et. al 2008, doi:10.1175/2008JTECHO608.1. ), the conclusion being warming is observable with the ARGO floats.

As for Steven Chu, this is an excellent choice.  Climate will certainly be a priority for him, but the umbrella of the DOE covers more than energy, and he is someone seemingly capable of managing other goals and bringing in the right people to tackle them, which are the qualities you want for someone in that post.  If a Czar is required that means we are resorting to draconian measures, and maybe we&#039;ll need to, but for now as long as the Stephen Johnsons and Spencer Abrahams are gone, I am excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the post you referenced, James, though it would be nice if you posted the peer reviewed journal article from which it is based.  I am guessing Lyman et al. 2006 (doi:10.1029/2006GL027033) which was subsequently explained by instrument bias from the same researchers (Lyman et. al 2008, doi:10.1175/2008JTECHO608.1. ), the conclusion being warming is observable with the ARGO floats.</p>
<p>As for Steven Chu, this is an excellent choice.  Climate will certainly be a priority for him, but the umbrella of the DOE covers more than energy, and he is someone seemingly capable of managing other goals and bringing in the right people to tackle them, which are the qualities you want for someone in that post.  If a Czar is required that means we are resorting to draconian measures, and maybe we&#8217;ll need to, but for now as long as the Stephen Johnsons and Spencer Abrahams are gone, I am excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Raider</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24383</link>
		<dc:creator>James Raider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/10/obama-does-pick-steven-chu-for-energy-secretary/#comment-24383</guid>
		<description>If we are to set serious guidelines to clean up our mess in the air and water, we should base decisions on sound data and not emotional hype.  For example, …
    
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/03/argo-4900781s-letter-to-bickering.html
    
While Al Gore&#039;s efforts to clean up the air and water should be applauded, his and other arguments on Global Warming seem rooted in information now appearing to be incorrect.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we are to set serious guidelines to clean up our mess in the air and water, we should base decisions on sound data and not emotional hype.  For example, …</p>
<p><a href="http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/03/argo-4900781s-letter-to-bickering.html" rel="nofollow">http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2008/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>03/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>argo-4900781s-letter-to-bickering.html</a></p>
<p>While Al Gore&#8217;s efforts to clean up the air and water should be applauded, his and other arguments on Global Warming seem rooted in information now appearing to be incorrect&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
