<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pew Center: Bush team at Poznań doing &#8220;a very good job, actually, of representing US interests&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:01:51 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24618</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24618</guid>
		<description>Contraction and convergence is the real killer. Rich developing countries will not agree to it as a principle and without this global agreement is impossible.

http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2231998/emerging-giants-small-islands</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contraction and convergence is the real killer. Rich developing countries will not agree to it as a principle and without this global agreement is impossible.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2231998/emerging-giants-small-islands" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessgreen.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>business-green/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>news/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2231998/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>emerging-giants-small-islands</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24614</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24614</guid>
		<description>paulm, interesting article. I was with him all the way until this para:

&quot;Nor is the sense of crisis really there. Those claiming we are near some kind of catastrophic tipping point simply have no science to back up their claims.&quot;

It is true that the necessary sense of crisis is missing, at least in the general public. The science IS there but it is complex and viewed as perhaps no more reliable than a weather forecast by many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paulm, interesting article. I was with him all the way until this para:</p>
<p>&#8220;Nor is the sense of crisis really there. Those claiming we are near some kind of catastrophic tipping point simply have no science to back up their claims.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is true that the necessary sense of crisis is missing, at least in the general public. The science IS there but it is complex and viewed as perhaps no more reliable than a weather forecast by many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24608</link>
		<dc:creator>paulm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24608</guid>
		<description>Heres a reality check - were not going to reduce our CO2 by anything near what is required....

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Let&#039;s get real on the environment&lt;/b&gt;
After the failure in Poznan, it&#039;s time to be honest: the world is not going to be cutting greenhouse gases anytime soon
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/dec/12/environment-climate-change-poznan

Not one of us – you, me, Obama or the greenest activist anywhere in the world – is willing to live without the comforts fossil fuels provide us – heat, light, instant hot food, convenient transportation, modern agriculture and airplane travel.
....
Obama will not change this. Americans will not accept large increases in what we pay for gasoline and electricity. President-elect Obama says he is going to solve the financial crisis, the healthcare crisis, the infrastructure crisis, the energy crisis, the climate crisis and perhaps even the intolerable shortage of magic pixie dust.

The man is quite the optimist. But let&#039;s not be completely stupid.
....
Nor is the sense of crisis really there. Those claiming we are near some kind of catastrophic tipping point simply have no science to back up their claims.
...
Even the world&#039;s climate organisers do not hesitate to fly thousands of miles to Poland and live high on the hog.

Given this, what can we do? Be realistic, first of all. Let&#039;s fund geo-engineering research to the hilt, exploring how we can someday modify our planet&#039;s natural systems to produce a slight atmospheric cooling. It is our destiny.
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heres a reality check &#8211; were not going to reduce our CO2 by anything near what is required&#8230;.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<b>Let&#8217;s get real on the environment</b><br />
After the failure in Poznan, it&#8217;s time to be honest: the world is not going to be cutting greenhouse gases anytime soon<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/dec/12/environment-climate-change-poznan" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>commentisfree/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>cifamerica/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2008/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>dec/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>12/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>environment-climate-change-poznan</a></p>
<p>Not one of us – you, me, Obama or the greenest activist anywhere in the world – is willing to live without the comforts fossil fuels provide us – heat, light, instant hot food, convenient transportation, modern agriculture and airplane travel.<br />
&#8230;.<br />
Obama will not change this. Americans will not accept large increases in what we pay for gasoline and electricity. President-elect Obama says he is going to solve the financial crisis, the healthcare crisis, the infrastructure crisis, the energy crisis, the climate crisis and perhaps even the intolerable shortage of magic pixie dust.</p>
<p>The man is quite the optimist. But let&#8217;s not be completely stupid.<br />
&#8230;.<br />
Nor is the sense of crisis really there. Those claiming we are near some kind of catastrophic tipping point simply have no science to back up their claims.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Even the world&#8217;s climate organisers do not hesitate to fly thousands of miles to Poland and live high on the hog.</p>
<p>Given this, what can we do? Be realistic, first of all. Let&#8217;s fund geo-engineering research to the hilt, exploring how we can someday modify our planet&#8217;s natural systems to produce a slight atmospheric cooling. It is our destiny.<br />
&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24606</link>
		<dc:creator>paulm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 07:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24606</guid>
		<description>This demonstrates why we are not going to get a democratic solution to climate change...

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Manchester says no to congestion charging
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/dec/12/congestioncharging-transport

Voters in Manchester have overwhelmingly rejected plans for a congestion charge after a city-wide referendum in which more than a million people voted.

The Greater Manchester scheme was rejected by 79% of voters, amid a turnout in the 10 boroughs of 53.2%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This demonstrates why we are not going to get a democratic solution to climate change&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
Manchester says no to congestion charging<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/dec/12/congestioncharging-transport" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>politics/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2008/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>dec/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>12/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>congestioncharging-transport</a></p>
<p>Voters in Manchester have overwhelmingly rejected plans for a congestion charge after a city-wide referendum in which more than a million people voted.</p>
<p>The Greater Manchester scheme was rejected by 79% of voters, amid a turnout in the 10 boroughs of 53.2%.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24599</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24599</guid>
		<description>Steve - I knew little (and still know little) about the rules of the Senate.

According to this article it would take a 67 Senators (a super majority) vote to change the 60 vote cloture rule (the manner in which filibusters are killed).

http://www.yuricareport.com/Law%20&amp;%20Legal/Senate%20Rules%20on%20Filibuster.html

If that&#039;s the case then I don&#039;t ever see this rule going away.  When/if one party had the 67 votes needed to do away with the 60 vote cloture rule they would have no need to do so.  And would most likely be looking forward to a time when they might be in the minority and might find it useful.

I think we&#039;re looking to the good people of Maine to lean hard on their senators.  

At least for two more years when several northern senate seats come due for reelection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; I knew little (and still know little) about the rules of the Senate.</p>
<p>According to this article it would take a 67 Senators (a super majority) vote to change the 60 vote cloture rule (the manner in which filibusters are killed).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yuricareport.com/Law%20&amp;%20Legal/Senate%20Rules%20on%20Filibuster.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.yuricareport.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>Law%20&amp;%20Legal/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>Senate%20Rules%20on%20Filibuster.html</a></p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case then I don&#8217;t ever see this rule going away.  When/if one party had the 67 votes needed to do away with the 60 vote cloture rule they would have no need to do so.  And would most likely be looking forward to a time when they might be in the minority and might find it useful.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re looking to the good people of Maine to lean hard on their senators.  </p>
<p>At least for two more years when several northern senate seats come due for reelection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24590</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24590</guid>
		<description>I would be embarrassed to be an American. A nation with double the carbon footprint of the average European should be making the first and deepest cuts, not dragging their feet.

I do not understand why you feel it is necessary to get the cap and trade bill through Congress before making a global committment. This makes no sense. Surely the global agreement comes first, followed by legislation at a national level to make it happen. That is what every other nation is doing.

The US seems to be turning delaying into an art form.

[&lt;em&gt;JR:  This is the way U.S. politics is.  But in any case, trying to negotiate a global agreement with 189 countries is not a productive use of time, as I&#039;ve explained.&lt;/em&gt;]  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be embarrassed to be an American. A nation with double the carbon footprint of the average European should be making the first and deepest cuts, not dragging their feet.</p>
<p>I do not understand why you feel it is necessary to get the cap and trade bill through Congress before making a global committment. This makes no sense. Surely the global agreement comes first, followed by legislation at a national level to make it happen. That is what every other nation is doing.</p>
<p>The US seems to be turning delaying into an art form.</p>
<p>[<em>JR:  This is the way U.S. politics is.  But in any case, trying to negotiate a global agreement with 189 countries is not a productive use of time, as I've explained.</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bloom</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24580</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24580</guid>
		<description>&quot;Democrats will be only a seat or two below the magic number of 60&quot;

Don&#039;t forget that this will only be true if Dems first vote to agree that the 60 vote rule will be in force for the upcoming session.  With so much at stake, it seems to me to be unconscionable to let this absurdly undemocratic &quot;tradition&quot; stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Democrats will be only a seat or two below the magic number of 60&#8243;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget that this will only be true if Dems first vote to agree that the 60 vote rule will be in force for the upcoming session.  With so much at stake, it seems to me to be unconscionable to let this absurdly undemocratic &#8220;tradition&#8221; stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24577</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24577</guid>
		<description>One of the jobs of our elected officials, especially members of the Senate, is to take a long term look at where we&#039;re headed.  We expect these people to keep our military ready to fend off an attacker, our federal agencies looking at what problems new pharmaceuticals might introduce....

Sometimes governments have to make decisions that might not match the present popular desires but that&#039;s why we set up something other than a pure democracy.

Next month we get a new Congress.  Democrats will be only a seat or two below the magic number of 60, at which a few crackpots can kill things that they don&#039;t like because it doesn&#039;t fit with their belief in a 6,000 year old universe.

Will those couple of Senators from the Northeast vote with the Southeast/Underpopulated Midlands to block progress and risk loosing their jobs?

I sort of doubt it. 

BTW, the most recent Gallup poll says that 89% of Americans say that global climate change is real and 68% say that we need to do something about it right now....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the jobs of our elected officials, especially members of the Senate, is to take a long term look at where we&#8217;re headed.  We expect these people to keep our military ready to fend off an attacker, our federal agencies looking at what problems new pharmaceuticals might introduce&#8230;.</p>
<p>Sometimes governments have to make decisions that might not match the present popular desires but that&#8217;s why we set up something other than a pure democracy.</p>
<p>Next month we get a new Congress.  Democrats will be only a seat or two below the magic number of 60, at which a few crackpots can kill things that they don&#8217;t like because it doesn&#8217;t fit with their belief in a 6,000 year old universe.</p>
<p>Will those couple of Senators from the Northeast vote with the Southeast/Underpopulated Midlands to block progress and risk loosing their jobs?</p>
<p>I sort of doubt it. </p>
<p>BTW, the most recent Gallup poll says that 89% of Americans say that global climate change is real and 68% say that we need to do something about it right now&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Rolley</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24569</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Rolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2008/12/13/pew-center-bush-team-at-poznan-doing-a-very-good-job-actually-of-representing-us-interests/#comment-24569</guid>
		<description>I think that Joe is correct that Obama will not be able to get a treaty ratified by the next Congress.  Between the denier rhetoric of anyone who listens to Inhofe and the &quot;we can&#039;t afford to do anything now&quot; logic of Republican Senators who want to turn the current recession into a campaign issue by opposing every governmental intervention, there is little hope. 

At the same time, Gore&#039;s optimism is misplaced.  When credible scientists are beginning to say that even 450 ppm is not achievable, he still talks as if a 350 goal can be.   At some point, that loses credibility and I think we have reached that point now. 

For all the discussion we do here, and at every other climate related NGO, blog, email list, the fact is that we have not convinced the average voter that we need to do anything now, even if they do believe that climate change is real.  Always, apparent short range economic benefit trumps not so apparent long range economic damage when a voter pulls the lever.   When the issue is whether or not someone will have a job tomorrow, it is very difficult to get them to think about whether Miami will flood by 2050.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Joe is correct that Obama will not be able to get a treaty ratified by the next Congress.  Between the denier rhetoric of anyone who listens to Inhofe and the &#8220;we can&#8217;t afford to do anything now&#8221; logic of Republican Senators who want to turn the current recession into a campaign issue by opposing every governmental intervention, there is little hope. </p>
<p>At the same time, Gore&#8217;s optimism is misplaced.  When credible scientists are beginning to say that even 450 ppm is not achievable, he still talks as if a 350 goal can be.   At some point, that loses credibility and I think we have reached that point now. </p>
<p>For all the discussion we do here, and at every other climate related NGO, blog, email list, the fact is that we have not convinced the average voter that we need to do anything now, even if they do believe that climate change is real.  Always, apparent short range economic benefit trumps not so apparent long range economic damage when a voter pulls the lever.   When the issue is whether or not someone will have a job tomorrow, it is very difficult to get them to think about whether Miami will flood by 2050.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
