<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientific American: Beef contributes 13 times the greenhouse gas impact of chicken, 57x potatoes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:16:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paulm</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28750</link>
		<dc:creator>paulm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28750</guid>
		<description>recreated veggie chicken....

http://www.itsallgoodfoods.com/our-products/chickn-breast.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>recreated veggie chicken&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.itsallgoodfoods.com/our-products/chickn-breast.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.itsallgoodfoods.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>our-products/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>chickn-breast.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28612</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28612</guid>
		<description>Vernon --- The temperature range associated with about 300 ppm CO2-equivalent would be just right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vernon &#8212; The temperature range associated with about 300 ppm CO2-equivalent would be just right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hollenberg</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28593</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hollenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28593</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Frank is thinking of this post when he refers to increased agricultural production:

http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/26/noaa-climate-change-irreversible-1000-years-drought-dust-bowls/

Oops... crops won&#039;t grow very well if the Southwest becomes a permanent dust bowl.

Or maybe this article:

http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/23/science-global-warming-is-killing-us-trees-a-dangerous-carbon-cycle-feedback/

Uh oh, that doesn&#039;t support his hypothesis either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Frank is thinking of this post when he refers to increased agricultural production:</p>
<p><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/26/noaa-climate-change-irreversible-1000-years-drought-dust-bowls/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2009/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>01/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>26/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>noaa-climate-change-irreversible-1000-years-drought-dust-bowls/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span></a></p>
<p>Oops&#8230; crops won&#8217;t grow very well if the Southwest becomes a permanent dust bowl.</p>
<p>Or maybe this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/23/science-global-warming-is-killing-us-trees-a-dangerous-carbon-cycle-feedback/" rel="nofollow">http://climateprogress.org/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2009/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>01/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>23/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>science-global-warming-is-killing-us-trees-a-dangerous-carbon-cycle-feedback/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span></a></p>
<p>Uh oh, that doesn&#8217;t support his hypothesis either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan G.</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28591</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28591</guid>
		<description>Frank says:

Here is recent link to some relevant research:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6855

And here is the Wiki link for the author.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_F._Ball

be sure to read the section on &quot;Disputes over qualifications to comment on Global warming&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank says:</p>
<p>Here is recent link to some relevant research:<br />
<a href="http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6855" rel="nofollow">http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6855</a></p>
<p>And here is the Wiki link for the author.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_F._Ball" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_F._Ball</a></p>
<p>be sure to read the section on &#8220;Disputes over qualifications to comment on Global warming&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dano</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28585</link>
		<dc:creator>Dano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28585</guid>
		<description>Not to mention the CO2 assertion by Timball is so easily disproven that it should be considered parody.

Best,

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the CO2 assertion by Timball is so easily disproven that it should be considered parody.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dano</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28580</link>
		<dc:creator>Dano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28580</guid>
		<description>Frank, 

your assertion is bullsh--, long-ago refuted. 

As I explain &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/01/windschuttle_hoaxed.php#comment-1355530&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, for the 1,627th time. 

Repeating long-ago refuted BS doesn&#039;t make it true.

Best,

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, </p>
<p>your assertion is bullsh&#8211;, long-ago refuted. </p>
<p>As I explain <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/01/windschuttle_hoaxed.php#comment-1355530" rel="nofollow">here</a>, for the 1,627th time. </p>
<p>Repeating long-ago refuted BS doesn&#8217;t make it true.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28554</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28554</guid>
		<description>Joe,

John&#039;s post sent me back to my previous comment to check it.  Try as I might, I can find nothing nonsensical in it, and nothing &#039;de-bunked&#039;.  Here is recent link to some relevant research:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6855</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>John&#8217;s post sent me back to my previous comment to check it.  Try as I might, I can find nothing nonsensical in it, and nothing &#8216;de-bunked&#8217;.  Here is recent link to some relevant research:<br />
<a href="http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6855" rel="nofollow">http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6855</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hollenberg</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28548</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hollenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28548</guid>
		<description>Joe,

How about deleting the long-debunked nonsense posted by Frank above?  It has no place on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>How about deleting the long-debunked nonsense posted by Frank above?  It has no place on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Levangie</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28543</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Levangie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28543</guid>
		<description>Environmental leader has a story about Britain&#039;s National Health reducing meat to cut CO2.

http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/01/28/uk-hospitals-cut-carbon-by-cutting-meat/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmental leader has a story about Britain&#8217;s National Health reducing meat to cut CO2.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/01/28/uk-hospitals-cut-carbon-by-cutting-meat/" rel="nofollow">http://www.environmentalleader.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2009/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>01/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>28/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>uk-hospitals-cut-carbon-by-cutting-meat/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28542</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/01/28/scientific-american-beef-contributes-13-times-the-greenhouse-gas-impact-of-chicken-57x-potatoes/#comment-28542</guid>
		<description>I would like to put in a good word for CO2 - it helps plants grow, and higher levels can increase agricultural productivity.  It has had no demonstrable effect as a driver of climate, but does seem to increase in the atmosphere following warmer periods in the climate record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to put in a good word for CO2 &#8211; it helps plants grow, and higher levels can increase agricultural productivity.  It has had no demonstrable effect as a driver of climate, but does seem to increase in the atmosphere following warmer periods in the climate record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
