<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we approaching Peak Coal? Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:22:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Bullis, Miastrada Co.</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-59719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bullis, Miastrada Co.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-59719</guid>
		<description>The link to the USGS study from Part I is:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1202/pdf/ofr2008-1202.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to the USGS study from Part I is:<br />
<a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1202/pdf/ofr2008-1202.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://pubs.usgs.gov/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>of/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2008/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>1202/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>pdf/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>ofr2008-1202.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Coal Energy</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29728</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Coal Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29728</guid>
		<description>Frankly speaking burning coal is still the leading source of global warming pollution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly speaking burning coal is still the leading source of global warming pollution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Bullis, Miastrada Co.</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29707</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bullis, Miastrada Co.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 03:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29707</guid>
		<description>For those interested in reality,  look at Fig. 66 of that USGS coal study.  I think that &quot;10 billion tons&quot; presumes a market price of $10 a ton.  This is old history.  We are already at $20 a ton which greatly expands the &quot;resource.&quot;  Note that $20 per ton corresponds to about $1 per million BTU of heat, which must be compared to $4 to $8 per million BTU for natural gas. 

We should not try to plan the future without recognizing that economic fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those interested in reality,  look at Fig. 66 of that USGS coal study.  I think that &#8220;10 billion tons&#8221; presumes a market price of $10 a ton.  This is old history.  We are already at $20 a ton which greatly expands the &#8220;resource.&#8221;  Note that $20 per ton corresponds to about $1 per million BTU of heat, which must be compared to $4 to $8 per million BTU for natural gas. </p>
<p>We should not try to plan the future without recognizing that economic fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29696</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29696</guid>
		<description>Does reducing consumption just have the effect of reducing the price of remaining supplies?  It seems the hurdle of convincing deniers that &#039;artificial&#039; price hikes through reglulation are for their long-term benefit is going to be a tall one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does reducing consumption just have the effect of reducing the price of remaining supplies?  It seems the hurdle of convincing deniers that &#8216;artificial&#8217; price hikes through reglulation are for their long-term benefit is going to be a tall one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B. Benson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29693</link>
		<dc:creator>David B. Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29693</guid>
		<description>Peak coal?

The sooner the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peak coal?</p>
<p>The sooner the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Campbell</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29657</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29657</guid>
		<description>How long until peak uranium? 50,000 years, if you use Integral Fast Reactors:

http://bravenewclimate.com/integral-fast-reactor-ifr-nuclear-power/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long until peak uranium? 50,000 years, if you use Integral Fast Reactors:</p>
<p><a href="http://bravenewclimate.com/integral-fast-reactor-ifr-nuclear-power/" rel="nofollow">http://bravenewclimate.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>integral-fast-reactor-ifr-nuclear-power/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony, rabid doomsayer</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29651</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony, rabid doomsayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29651</guid>
		<description>How long to peak uranium?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long to peak uranium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jorleh</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29649</link>
		<dc:creator>jorleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/2009/02/12/clean-energy-action-peak-coal-usgs-reserves/#comment-29649</guid>
		<description>Not much coal and oil 2050 in any case. What energy are we using then, the demand being threefold?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much coal and oil 2050 in any case. What energy are we using then, the demand being threefold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
