<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top energy and climate stories for April 8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:48:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38364</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38364</guid>
		<description>What Salazar says is consistent with what Jacobson and his group at Stanford are finding.  Their data shows that roughly 35% of the power produced by connected wind farms is 100%, 24/365, baseload reliable.

With some load shifting and storage a lot of the other 65% can be used to replace coal baseload.  The portion that is still too undependable for baseload use can be used to charge electric vehicles.

If we wanted to do a 100% replacement of coal with wind we might have to build 2x as much wind production.  But that extra power wouldn&#039;t be wasted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Salazar says is consistent with what Jacobson and his group at Stanford are finding.  Their data shows that roughly 35% of the power produced by connected wind farms is 100%, 24/365, baseload reliable.</p>
<p>With some load shifting and storage a lot of the other 65% can be used to replace coal baseload.  The portion that is still too undependable for baseload use can be used to charge electric vehicles.</p>
<p>If we wanted to do a 100% replacement of coal with wind we might have to build 2x as much wind production.  But that extra power wouldn&#8217;t be wasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SecularAnimist</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38349</link>
		<dc:creator>SecularAnimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38349</guid>
		<description>I posted a comment linking to this article earlier today, but now it is gone. Was there something wrong with it?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10215630-54.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Interior secretary: Wind could replace coal power&lt;/a&gt;
by Erik Palm
CNet News
04/08/2009

Excerpt:

&lt;blockquote&gt;

Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar is optimistic about the potential of wind power to help wean the U.S. from dependence on foreign oil.

&quot;The idea that wind energy has the potential to replace most of our coal-burning power today is a very real possibility,&quot; he said. &quot;It is not technology that is pie-in-the sky; it is here and now,&quot; Salazar said, according to an AP report, at a meeting in Atlantic City, N.J., Monday.

Salazar is hosting four regional public meetings in April to discuss the future of offshore energy development on the nation&#039;s Outer Continental Shelf on the East Coast.

At the Atlantic City forum, he presented estimates from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory that said wind has a gross resource of 463 gigawatts of power in the mid-Atlantic area alone. The current U.S. total production of electricity from coal is 366 gigawatts, according to the Energy Information Administration.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a comment linking to this article earlier today, but now it is gone. Was there something wrong with it?</p>
<p><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10215630-54.html" rel="nofollow">Interior secretary: Wind could replace coal power</a><br />
by Erik Palm<br />
CNet News<br />
04/08/2009</p>
<p>Excerpt:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar is optimistic about the potential of wind power to help wean the U.S. from dependence on foreign oil.</p>
<p>&#8220;The idea that wind energy has the potential to replace most of our coal-burning power today is a very real possibility,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It is not technology that is pie-in-the sky; it is here and now,&#8221; Salazar said, according to an AP report, at a meeting in Atlantic City, N.J., Monday.</p>
<p>Salazar is hosting four regional public meetings in April to discuss the future of offshore energy development on the nation&#8217;s Outer Continental Shelf on the East Coast.</p>
<p>At the Atlantic City forum, he presented estimates from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory that said wind has a gross resource of 463 gigawatts of power in the mid-Atlantic area alone. The current U.S. total production of electricity from coal is 366 gigawatts, according to the Energy Information Administration.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Wallace</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38309</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38309</guid>
		<description>Folks:

If you&#039;ve got a link that you think valuable to others, please take a few moments and write a couple of summary sentences.  Give people the basic info so that they can decide if they want more detail.

Practice good journalism....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks:</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got a link that you think valuable to others, please take a few moments and write a couple of summary sentences.  Give people the basic info so that they can decide if they want more detail.</p>
<p>Practice good journalism&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul morrison</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38279</link>
		<dc:creator>paul morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38279</guid>
		<description>http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/mayor-unveils-plan-to-turn-london-into-electric-car-capital-of-europe-1666129.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/mayor-unveils-plan-to-turn-london-into-electric-car-capital-of-europe-1666129.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.independent.co.uk/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>environment/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>climate-change/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>mayor-unveils-plan-to-turn-london-into-electric-car-capital-of-europe-1666129.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dano</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38278</guid>
		<description>Good addition Joe. &lt;i&gt;Desdemona Despair&lt;/i&gt; is also a good resource. Thank you also for the &#039;preview&#039; button. 

Best,

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good addition Joe. <i>Desdemona Despair</i> is also a good resource. Thank you also for the &#8216;preview&#8217; button. </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RunawayRose</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38277</link>
		<dc:creator>RunawayRose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38277</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the new feature; lots of good links in the story and the comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the new feature; lots of good links in the story and the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dill Weed</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38275</link>
		<dc:creator>Dill Weed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38275</guid>
		<description>Looks like I found a one stop shoping for my daily climate change fix. I may trim a few sites from my Favorites. 

Dill Weed the Great

[&lt;em&gt;JR:  That is what I&#039;m here for!&lt;/em&gt;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I found a one stop shoping for my daily climate change fix. I may trim a few sites from my Favorites. </p>
<p>Dill Weed the Great</p>
<p>[<em>JR:  That is what I'm here for!</em>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrD</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38267</link>
		<dc:creator>DrD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38267</guid>
		<description>Sasparilla:  Thanks for the link to the article on Australia.  I knew it was bad there, but this was a good (bad?) overview.  I assume, though, that some people must be making comparisons to the Dust Bowl in the US in the 1930s and pointing out that it was temporary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasparilla:  Thanks for the link to the article on Australia.  I knew it was bad there, but this was a good (bad?) overview.  I assume, though, that some people must be making comparisons to the Dust Bowl in the US in the 1930s and pointing out that it was temporary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecostew</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38263</link>
		<dc:creator>ecostew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38263</guid>
		<description>Sasparilla - one would hope the Australian article would catch people&#039;s attention that AGW impacts are not decades away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasparilla &#8211; one would hope the Australian article would catch people&#8217;s attention that AGW impacts are not decades away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cait</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/04/08/energy-global-warming-news-4-08-09/#comment-38255</link>
		<dc:creator>Cait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=5390#comment-38255</guid>
		<description>Joseph, you caught the NASA research about aerosols, yes?

http://tr.im/isqK

Very interesting stuff. Obviously, it&#039;s the followup that&#039;s important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph, you caught the NASA research about aerosols, yes?</p>
<p><a href="http://tr.im/isqK" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/isqK</a></p>
<p>Very interesting stuff. Obviously, it&#8217;s the followup that&#8217;s important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
