<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Must-read (again) study: How the press bungles its coverage of climate economics — “The media’s decision to play the stenographer role helped opponents of climate action stifle progress.”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:15:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Covert</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48488</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Covert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48488</guid>
		<description>Survival Acres,

Your source also denies the impending peak and decline in oil production in the Middle East. I wish this were on an episode of Saturday Night Live&#039;s Weekend Update segment, Really?! with Seth Myers and Amy Poehler. 

http://masterresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/crop-circles.pdf

It would probably sound like this, &quot;Really! So you think oil is just going to keep flowing! Really?! We can just keep using it in our single occupant Hummer H2&#039;s and it will continue to be available at the same price and availability even though increased demand is being driven here and in China and India. Huh! Really?!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Survival Acres,</p>
<p>Your source also denies the impending peak and decline in oil production in the Middle East. I wish this were on an episode of Saturday Night Live&#8217;s Weekend Update segment, Really?! with Seth Myers and Amy Poehler. </p>
<p><a href="http://masterresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/crop-circles.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://masterresource.org/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>wp-content/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>uploads/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>2008/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>12/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>crop-circles.pdf</a></p>
<p>It would probably sound like this, &#8220;Really! So you think oil is just going to keep flowing! Really?! We can just keep using it in our single occupant Hummer H2&#8217;s and it will continue to be available at the same price and availability even though increased demand is being driven here and in China and India. Huh! Really?!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail Denemark</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48473</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail Denemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48473</guid>
		<description>I certainly agree that there is much room for improvement (an understatement) in media reporting on all aspects of  climate change.  However, I don&#039;t believe that we can assume that good reporting will do the trick and tip the balance of awareness and support for bold action.

Considering both the necessity for comprehensive global action right now, paired with the complexity of the climate issue and it&#039;s lack of readily discernible cause and effect impacts, I believe we will not be moved to the kind of bold, all-encompassing action that is necessary, until our global leaders come before the public and speak in grave tones of the looming danger and the urgency for immediate, comprehensive action.  President Obama needs to tell it straight up..... &quot;we are facing a dire EMERGENCY!&quot;

Until the public (and our legislators) fully appreciate that we are in EMERGENCY mode, we will continue down the business as usual path with all of the standard political wrangling and gamesmanship.  Delays and dilutions will get in the way of the necessary action.

The climate catastrophe is unlike any problem humanity has faced.  It&#039;s time that our response (and particularly that of our leaders) reflects the grave threats that climate change poses.  We simply don&#039;t have time to treat this issue like any other important social issue... figuring that progress will come in due time.  When the tipping points come due, we&#039;ll be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree that there is much room for improvement (an understatement) in media reporting on all aspects of  climate change.  However, I don&#8217;t believe that we can assume that good reporting will do the trick and tip the balance of awareness and support for bold action.</p>
<p>Considering both the necessity for comprehensive global action right now, paired with the complexity of the climate issue and it&#8217;s lack of readily discernible cause and effect impacts, I believe we will not be moved to the kind of bold, all-encompassing action that is necessary, until our global leaders come before the public and speak in grave tones of the looming danger and the urgency for immediate, comprehensive action.  President Obama needs to tell it straight up&#8230;.. &#8220;we are facing a dire EMERGENCY!&#8221;</p>
<p>Until the public (and our legislators) fully appreciate that we are in EMERGENCY mode, we will continue down the business as usual path with all of the standard political wrangling and gamesmanship.  Delays and dilutions will get in the way of the necessary action.</p>
<p>The climate catastrophe is unlike any problem humanity has faced.  It&#8217;s time that our response (and particularly that of our leaders) reflects the grave threats that climate change poses.  We simply don&#8217;t have time to treat this issue like any other important social issue&#8230; figuring that progress will come in due time.  When the tipping points come due, we&#8217;ll be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecostew</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48421</link>
		<dc:creator>ecostew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48421</guid>
		<description>The climate change report is found here under special reports:

http://www.nsf.gov/index.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The climate change report is found here under special reports:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nsf.gov/index.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nsf.gov/index.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecostew</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48418</link>
		<dc:creator>ecostew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48418</guid>
		<description>NSF climate change: http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/climate/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NSF climate change: <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/climate/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/climate/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48367</guid>
		<description>Okay, the Press and Journalists don’t have the correct balance to this Global Warming problem.    But to be fair, lets see what scientists and scientific websites have on and emphasize.    

I went on the National Academy of Sciences website.   They had one link to Climate Change in a Popular Searches box.    Climate Change was even after Evolution.    

http://www.nas.edu/

Now could someone from this website get a sense of the importance of Climate Change to the health of humans on this planet from this websites front page?   They even had Evolution before Climate Change.    I can get that evolution is important to many in the science community, but mostly any and every bodies opinion on evolution will not have any impact on our planet, scientists will keep doing what they are doing and the general public will keep doing what is doing.    But with Climate Change, the importance is paramount to the well being of future generations.

It’s not just the Press and Journalists who don’t have a clue, but the scientists also.

The Biologists, Chemists, Physicists and Engineering had better come around to the idea that many of their projects and pet projects might have to come second to a livable human civilization.   The press and journalists are just doing the same thing the scientists are doing and are in psychological denial about the seriousness of this and letting the big problems fall to somebody else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, the Press and Journalists don’t have the correct balance to this Global Warming problem.    But to be fair, lets see what scientists and scientific websites have on and emphasize.    </p>
<p>I went on the National Academy of Sciences website.   They had one link to Climate Change in a Popular Searches box.    Climate Change was even after Evolution.    </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nas.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nas.edu/</a></p>
<p>Now could someone from this website get a sense of the importance of Climate Change to the health of humans on this planet from this websites front page?   They even had Evolution before Climate Change.    I can get that evolution is important to many in the science community, but mostly any and every bodies opinion on evolution will not have any impact on our planet, scientists will keep doing what they are doing and the general public will keep doing what is doing.    But with Climate Change, the importance is paramount to the well being of future generations.</p>
<p>It’s not just the Press and Journalists who don’t have a clue, but the scientists also.</p>
<p>The Biologists, Chemists, Physicists and Engineering had better come around to the idea that many of their projects and pet projects might have to come second to a livable human civilization.   The press and journalists are just doing the same thing the scientists are doing and are in psychological denial about the seriousness of this and letting the big problems fall to somebody else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48320</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48320</guid>
		<description>Bill M,

Glad to hear that Australia has some good climate coverage, but it isn&#039;t all good.  Tim Lambert blogs at Deltoid and has great AGW coverage, including a series he calls &quot;the Australian&#039;s War on Science&quot;.

Lambert is a smart, consistent, and funny observer on a range of issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill M,</p>
<p>Glad to hear that Australia has some good climate coverage, but it isn&#8217;t all good.  Tim Lambert blogs at Deltoid and has great AGW coverage, including a series he calls &#8220;the Australian&#8217;s War on Science&#8221;.</p>
<p>Lambert is a smart, consistent, and funny observer on a range of issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Shapiro</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48316</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Shapiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48316</guid>
		<description>Joe,

OT, but kudos:  CNET quotes you in Martin LaMonica&#039;s article on Google&#039;s clean energy initiatives, in particular its experiments with offsets.  Google has been near-perfect on energy -- continuously improving efficiency in its data centers, using clean energy, starting to measure upstream and downstream energy use, lobbying for clean energy (they claim), and experimenting with offsets while acknowledging their limitations.

And LaMonica, CNET&#039;S &quot;green-tech&quot; reporter, is about as good as they get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>OT, but kudos:  CNET quotes you in Martin LaMonica&#8217;s article on Google&#8217;s clean energy initiatives, in particular its experiments with offsets.  Google has been near-perfect on energy &#8212; continuously improving efficiency in its data centers, using clean energy, starting to measure upstream and downstream energy use, lobbying for clean energy (they claim), and experimenting with offsets while acknowledging their limitations.</p>
<p>And LaMonica, CNET&#8217;S &#8220;green-tech&#8221; reporter, is about as good as they get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Eisner</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48297</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Eisner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 13:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48297</guid>
		<description>We must all do our part to rectify this situation with the press and media in general. I am giving public lectures and have started a newspaper column on global warming in &quot;Thealternativepress&quot;, an on-line newspaper in New Jersey. Also, I try to help like-minded politicians in any way I can: money, photography, campaigning at election time.
Everyone involved in &quot;Climate Progress&quot;, especially Joe Romm, is doing a wonderful job; the world should and will long appreciate him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must all do our part to rectify this situation with the press and media in general. I am giving public lectures and have started a newspaper column on global warming in &#8220;Thealternativepress&#8221;, an on-line newspaper in New Jersey. Also, I try to help like-minded politicians in any way I can: money, photography, campaigning at election time.<br />
Everyone involved in &#8220;Climate Progress&#8221;, especially Joe Romm, is doing a wonderful job; the world should and will long appreciate him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecostew</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48279</link>
		<dc:creator>ecostew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48279</guid>
		<description>One might change this cartoon:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/opinions/tomtoles/?hpid=opinionsbox1

For example:

Swine flu = malaria
Climate change stats
Eating pork = climate change</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might change this cartoon:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/opinions/tomtoles/?hpid=opinionsbox1" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>wp-dyn/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>content/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>opinions/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>tomtoles/<span style="font-size: 1px;"> </span>?hpid=opinionsbox1</a></p>
<p>For example:</p>
<p>Swine flu = malaria<br />
Climate change stats<br />
Eating pork = climate change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Wood</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/05/07/media-coverage-climate-economics-pooley/#comment-48217</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=6431#comment-48217</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything Bill McKinnen said, except on the quality of the Australian media. There is a lot of very good quality commentary in the Australian media, but some of it is not so good. In particular, there are many news stories which will report something from a spokesperson from an emissions intensive industry, who is trying to make out that carbon pricing will be bad, but not any other view points. A good list of some of these articles is &lt;a href=&quot;http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/12/19/climate-change-emo-watch/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; -- I don&#039;t have a problem with the media reporting what an industry body is saying, but most of the time journalists will not get an opinion from anyone else (such as an economist or an environmentalist) commenting on whether the opinion is true or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything Bill McKinnen said, except on the quality of the Australian media. There is a lot of very good quality commentary in the Australian media, but some of it is not so good. In particular, there are many news stories which will report something from a spokesperson from an emissions intensive industry, who is trying to make out that carbon pricing will be bad, but not any other view points. A good list of some of these articles is <a href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2008/12/19/climate-change-emo-watch/" rel="nofollow">here</a> &#8212; I don&#8217;t have a problem with the media reporting what an industry body is saying, but most of the time journalists will not get an opinion from anyone else (such as an economist or an environmentalist) commenting on whether the opinion is true or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
