“The Web's most influential climate-change blogger” — Time Magazine A Project of Center for American Progress Action Fund

Energy and Global Warming News for July 6th: “The incandescent bulb is turning into a case study of the way government mandates can spur innovation”; seasonal shifts starving millions of the world’s poorest

July 6, 2009

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/07/06/business/06bulb1_600.jpg

“A standard incandescent bulb, left, and a more efficient one using Deposition Sciences technology.”

Incandescent Bulbs Return to the Cutting Edge

When Congress passed a new energy law two years ago, obituaries were written for the incandescent light bulb. The law set tough efficiency standards, due to take effect in 2012, that no traditional incandescent bulb on the market could meet, and a century-old technology that helped create the modern world seemed to be doomed.

But as it turns out, the obituaries were premature.

Researchers across the country have been racing to breathe new life into Thomas Edison’s light bulb, a pursuit that accelerated with the new legislation. Amid that footrace, one company is already marketing limited quantities of incandescent bulbs that meet the 2012 standard, and researchers are promising a wave of innovative products in the next few years.

Indeed, the incandescent bulb is turning into a case study of the way government mandates can spur innovation.

Millions hungry as warming shifts seasons: Oxfam

…In a new report, global aid agency Oxfam says impoverished communities like Nassapir [in Uganda] are already being hit hard by the effects of global warming, including increased drought.

Without international funding to help them cope and tough targets for cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, the food, water, health and livelihoods of hundreds of millions of the world’s poorest people will be put at even greater risk.

Oxfam says interviews it carried out with farmers in 15 countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America show that seasons are shrinking in number and variety.

Oxfam Details Economic Impact of Warming

Cities like New Delhi in India could see as much as a 30 percent drop in worker productivity because rising temperatures will make it impossible for people to work at the same rate on hot summer days without serious health impacts, Oxfam, the international aid group, warned on Monday.

Oxfam laid out warnings about the effects of climate change on poorer regions of the world as global leaders prepare to meet at the G8 summit later this week. Oxfam said it was seeking to rally leaders to agree to help developing nations adapt to the inevitable effects of climate change. Those effects, groups like Oxfam say, are likely to happen even if a global agreement to cut greenhouse gas emissions is reached later this year.

New York inches closer to offshore wind farm

Government agencies and power companies said on Wednesday they are gauging interest from developers and manufacturers about building a wind farm about 13 miles off the New York city coast that could end up being the largest such project in the United States.

The Long Island Power Authority, the New York Power Authority, other agencies and Consolidated Edison Inc hope to build the 350 megawatt wind farm off the Rockaway Peninsula in the Atlantic.

Potentially, the project could be expanded to 700 MW, giving it a shot of being the biggest U.S. offshore wind farm. One megawatt powers about 1,000 homes in New York, but wind does not blow all of the time.

NYC hails new eco landmark, mulls sweeping code changes

Manhattan’s newest landmark building, the Bank of America Tower, has become a symbol of both the city’s hope for a recovery from last year’s financial crash and its push to become the United States’ greenest city.

Though the building is not finished, Bank of America and the Durst Organization, which controls half the property, say 98 percent of its space has been leased. And while the project had stalled after five years of work as cash dried up, a consortium of banks last week extended $1.3 billion in financing to complete construction by next year.

The 55-story tower — said to be New York’s second tallest, after the Empire State Building — has its own on-site 5-megawatt cogeneration power plant, windows that allow in maximum daylight while shielding heat, waterless toilets and a graywater recycling system. The building will qualify for a “platinum” rating under the U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program, the highest possible.

New DOE loan guarantees aid turbine maker, energy storage plant

The Energy Department today announced two conditional loan guarantees totaling $59 million to help a wind turbine company expand its Idaho assembly site and to support construction of an energy storage plant in upstate New York.

The guarantees are the second and third that DOE has announced under the closely watched program to fund low-emissions energy projects, following a much larger conditional guarantee issued in March for a California-based solar company (E&ENews PM, March 20).

G8 leaders to set emissions goals

The G8 leaders are set this week to deliver their strongest statement so far on global warming.

They are likely to agree that the world ought to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2050 — with rich nations reducing them by 80%.

The group will probably also say that any human-induced temperature rise should be held to 2C – a level considered to be a danger threshold.

The US has previously objected to such a clause.

Britain Could Be Wind and Wave Titan

Britain could become the largest producer of electricity from offshore wind by the end of the next decade, according to the Carbon Trust, a group funded by the British government.

With carefully targeted subsidies and regulations, Britain could build 29 gigawatts of capacity compared to a global total of 66 gigawatts by 2020, giving it 45 percent of the offshore power market, said the Carbon Trust. By comparison, Germany would have 12 gigawatts by 2020, the group said.

The group also noted that a quarter of all wave power technologies are being developed in Britain and that the country “could be the ‘natural owner’ of the global wave power market” this century.

Environment Agency preps carbon police force (UK)

The Environment Agency is to launch a dedicated unit of around 50 auditors and inspectors tasked with ensuring that the government’s imminent Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) legislation is properly enforced.

According to reports in The Sunday Times, the new unit will be given wide ranging powers, including the right to search company premises, view energy meters and seize records.

Funding Boost for Waste Methane Processor

Landfills, coal beds and cattle feedlots all produce methane, which is often either flared — that is, burned off — or released into the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas.

Prometheus Energy, a five-year-old company based in Redmond, Wash., has developed a technology to turn that waste methane into liquid natural gas. And the company this week raised $20 million from the Shell Technology Ventures Fund, a fund related to the petroleum company Royal Dutch Shell and Black River Asset Management, a subsidiary of the agriculture giant Cargill.

The deal represents a vote of confidence from a fund connected to the world’s largest nongovernmental producer of liquid natural gas, and industry insiders say it’s a victory for a technology that has remained small until now.

Small Heat-Shielded Habitats Could Help Threatened Species Survive Climate Change

Intelligent countryside management could improve the survival chances of animal and plant species threatened by climate change. The creation of small heat-shielded habitats and better links between habitats would counteract a moderate temperature increase and give threatened species more time to adapt better and/or to migrate to cooler regions.

This is the conclusion drawn by scientists at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) from a British study on saving the Large Blue butterfly (Maculinea arion). This butterfly became extinct in Britain in 1979 and was reintroduced there 25 years ago. Since then, the butterfly’s reintroduction is seen as a model for the conservation of endangered insects.

Shell Disputes Amnesty Report on Nigeria

As violence in Nigeria’s oil-rich Niger Delta escalates, Amnesty International released a new report this week condemning oil companies for wide-scale environmental damages and abuse of impoverished communities along the delta.

But Royal Dutch Shell, the Anglo-Dutch oil giant that created the Nigerian oil industry, has reacted testily to the new campaign by the human rights group, saying the report failed to provide a proper picture of what caused violence and degradation in the delta.

The report, “Petroleum, pollution and poverty in the Niger Delta,” highlights some well-known and undisputed complaints, particularly among villagers and local activists.

15 Responses to “Energy and Global Warming News for July 6th: “The incandescent bulb is turning into a case study of the way government mandates can spur innovation”; seasonal shifts starving millions of the world’s poorest”

  1. paulm says:

    I think this is worth noting….

    Just add lime (to the sea) – the latest plan to cut CO2 emissions
    • Project ‘could turn back clock’ on carbon dioxide
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/ environment/ 2009/ jul/ 06/ lime-sea-carbon-dioxide-emissions

    Putting lime into the oceans could stop or even reverse the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere, according to proposals unveiled at a conference on climate change solutions in Manchester today.

    According to its advocates, the same technique could help fix one of the most dangerous side effects of man-made CO2 emissions: rising ocean acidity.

    The project, known as Cquestrate, is the brainchild of Tim Kruger,… “This is an idea that can not only stop the clock on carbon dioxide, it can turn it back,” he said, although he conceded that tipping large quantities of lime into the sea would currently be illegal.

    [JR: "Kruger admits there are challenges to overcome: the world would need to mine and process about 10 cubic kilometres of limestone each year to soak up all the emissions the world produces, and the plan would only make sense if the CO2 resulting from lime production could be captured and buried at source." But other than that, awesome idea!]

  2. paulm says:

    So Canada is front and center of the weather pattern shift also.

    If we think that global civilization will survive 2°s then we’ve missed the cue ball.

    I heard about this on the national radio this morning, CBC, and guess what – they didn’t even mention climate change much less GW! Surprise surprise.
    (Parts of China is in the middle of a 50 yrs dry also).

    Alberta, Saskatchewan face widespread drought after driest weather in 50 years
    http://ca.news.yahoo.com/ s/ capress/ 090701/ national/ prairies_drought

    The driest June ever across Alberta, extending into parts of Saskatchewan, is scorching soccer fields, scratching golf courses, affecting crops and wildlife reproduction and prompting a ban on private fireworks.

    “Nobody could really predict that we would have this drought. We are not totally prepared.” [here we go, paulm]

    “The economic impacts could be huge for producers.”

    Alberta Agriculture said that during the past two centuries, 40 droughts have hit Western Canada, the last from 1999-2004, which was deemed the worst in a century.

    “Compared to the last drought for the Priaries in 2002, this is larger and more widespread with about the same intensity,” said Ralph Wright, a soil moisture expert with the department.

  3. paulm says:

    …CO2 resulting from lime production could be captured and buried at source.”

    Yeah, that CO2 emission from solutions is going to be popping up and snapping at the bottom line now everywhere.

    There is also the CO2 that’s going to be generated from the adaptation to the changing climate.

    Its going to be an interesting race.

  4. paulm says:

    Gavin Schmidt: a climatologist trying to give out the right signals amid the noise

    Leading Nasa climate scientist says increasing the level of noise is a useful political tactic in interview in The Edge magazine
    http://www.edge.org/ 3rd_culture/ schmidt09/ schmidt09_index.html

  5. Bob Wright says:

    Regarding lime: Pulverized limestone (CO2 not burned off) added to the sea would help drive the CO3… buffer back towards the optimal pH. Wollastonite-like minerals might react with CO2 in the oceans to form carbonates. (That is also a CO2 sequestration scheme.)

    This is geoengineering stuff. Is there enough limestone in the entire world? Mountaintop removal in New York State to mine wollastonite?

  6. “They [G8 leaders] are likely to agree that the world ought to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2050 — with rich nations reducing them by 80%. The group will probably also say that any human-induced temperature rise should be held to 2C – a level considered to be a danger threshold.”

    Only one problem: reducing emissions by 50% by 2050 is not good enough to keep temperature increases down to 2C.

    [JR: Actually, it's probably pretty close. Depends on the baseline year. And, of course, it is four decades from now -- so it will inevitably be reduced as the dire nature of the situation becomes clearer to all.]

  7. Jim Beacon says:

    Breaking news (bad news):

    The vast amount of carbon stored in the arctic and boreal regions of the world is more than DOUBLE that previously estimated, according to a study published this week by the American Geophysical Union’s journal of Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

    “We now estimate the deposits contain over 1.5 trillion tons of frozen carbon, about twice as much carbon as contained in the atmosphere”, said Dr. Charles Tarnocai, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, and lead author.

    More on this at:
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/ 2009/ 06/ 090630132005.htm

    The word “yikes!” come to mind.

  8. David B. Benson says:

    Bob Wright — More than enough limestone, vastly more.

  9. russ says:

    My calculations came up with either 1.0 trillion or 3.0 trillion tons – it was kind of dark in the bar and we had been drinking for a few hours plus the napkin I was using us soggy and small.

    My make believe calculation is no doubt just as accurate as that of Dr. Whatshisface.

    Hope I am dead and gone before they start modifying the ocean – I am sure they will learn a lot in doing so – many nasty facts the ’scientists’ hadn’t thought about before.

    I read about some new green jobs – San Fransisco is putting a 20 cent per pack tax on cigarettes to pay for cleaning them off the streets. Now they will have to import labor to do the clean up I suppose.

  10. David B. Benson says:

    Limestone s.g. is 2691 kg/m^3 so a trillion tonnes is only 371.6 million m^3 = 0.3716 km^3.

    Doubt that is enough.

  11. Ronald Brak says:

    Is there enough limestone to buffer the oceans? Yes, a huge chunk of Australia, right next to the Southern Ocean is limestone. Does the idea make any real world sense? Afraid not.

  12. Konrad says:

    As an Industrial Designer, the light bulb story caught my eye. I had to look at lifecycle analysis on the compact fluorescent when I was at university. The numbers did not look good. These energy saving bulbs were not designed for recycling and contain too many disparate materials and toxic chemicals. I would have been more impressed with grants for increased LED research rather than the proposed incandescent ban in Australia. This story shows there are other promising alternatives.

  13. Jim Beacon says:

    C’mon, guys, there is no more time for this blue-sky Buck Rogers mega-engineering crap. If you could put enough limestone into the seas to do any good — doubtful, and how would that be cheaper and easier than reducing CO2 emissions at the source anyway — but if you did, there is no question you would alter the pH balance of the ocean dramatically enough to do all kinds of horrible things to it as a livable environment for everything from plankton to whales. Who in their right mind would ever take the chance on doing something like this? We have no way of knowing what the end result would be and no amount of small-scale research could possibly give you a reliable clue as to what would happen on a global scale. And if it turned out to be a really bad mistake, there would be no way to reverse it.

    It’s a stupid and dangerous idea. Hell, putting an umbrella shield up in space between the earth and the sun is a much more practical idea which would cost far less and be adjustable/reversible if it didn’t quite work as planned — not that I recommend that mega-pie-in-the-sky concept either.

    How about we get real and stop looking for gigantic techno-rescue plans to alleviate us of the responsibility we must face up to in order to dramatically change our society and work our way out of this mess? There simply is not going to be a mega-fix come along to bail us out at the last second, folks. Get over it and get on with doing what each of us really needs to do on a micro-fix basis.

  14. Mike#22 says:

    “Only one problem: reducing emissions by 50% by 2050 is not good enough to keep temperature increases down to 2C.”

    That is true if emissions peak later, and cumulative emissions at 2050 are too high.

    However, if emissions peak very soon, and delcine quickly at first, then cumulative emissions would be lower at 2050, and more in line with meeting the 2 deg C target, even with 50% of 1990 levels at 2050. (Of course, that is 2 deg C globally, twice that over land in temperate regions. Too Hot)

    ACES creates the overall structure where CO2 emissions from major sources are capped. The current schedules shows peaking in 2014.

    If we get another “hottest year on record”, even more dramatic ice losses, and a few killer heat waves, the public awarenes on our current situation will ramp up. With ACES in place here in the US, Cap and Trade going strong in the EU, and a succesful international treaty from Copenhagen, we will have a planet wide mechanism available to shift the global energy market away from pollution and waste towards efficiency and renewables. (need an article on the recent success of the EU CO2 market)

    While I would not discourage individual efforts to reduce their CO2 pollution, as an overall strategy, it is nearly useless. Imagine if Winston Churchill told his country to “grab their shotguns and row towards Germany” instead of what he actually did. To rework our economy into a clean green machine in the time frame we have now requires legislation like ACES.

  15. Mike#22 says:

    Jim Beacon quotes & writes:

    “We now estimate the deposits contain over 1.5 trillion tons of frozen carbon, about twice as much carbon as contained in the atmosphere”, said Dr. Charles Tarnocai, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, and lead author.

    More on this at:
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/ releases/ 2009/ 06/ 090630132005.htm

    The word “yikes!” come to mind.

    Peter Sinclair’s latest video has a clip of Chu talking about the permafrost bomb: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MozcU7woNNQ