As the world has talked for a dozen years about what to do next, new ship passages opened through the once frozen summer sea ice of the Arctic. In Greenland and Antarctica, ice sheets have lost trillions of tons of ice. Mountain glaciers in Europe, South America, Asia and Africa are shrinking faster than before.
And it’s not just the frozen parts of the world that have felt the heat in the dozen years leading up to next month’s climate summit in Copenhagen:
The world’s oceans have risen by about an inch and a half.– Droughts and wildfires have turned more severe worldwide, from the U.S. West to Australia to the Sahel desert of North Africa.
– Species now in trouble because of changing climate include, not just the lumbering polar bear which has become a symbol of global warming, but also fragile butterflies, colorful frogs and entire stands of North American pine forests.
– Temperatures over the past 12 years are 0.4 of a degree warmer than the dozen years leading up to 1997.
Even the gloomiest climate models back in the 1990s didn’t forecast results quite this bad so fast.
“The latest science is telling us we are in more trouble than we thought,” said Janos Pasztor, climate adviser to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.
Another excellent article from the AP’s Seth Borenstein (see Must-read AP story: Statisticians reject global cooling; Caldeira — “To talk about global cooling at the end of the hottest decade the planet has experienced in many thousands of years is ridiculous”). Borenstein actually takes the time to talk to real climate scientists, and when you do, the story writes itself:
And the effects of greenhouse gases are more powerful and happening sooner than predicted, scientists said.
“Back in 1997, the impacts (of climate change) were underestimated; the rate of change has been faster,” said Virginia Burkett, chief scientist for global change research at the U.S. Geological Survey….
That last part alarms former Vice President Al Gore, who helped broker a last-minute deal in Kyoto.
“We’ve come from a time in 1997 where this was some abstract problem working its way around scientific circles to now when the problem is in everyone’s face,” said Andrew Weaver, a University of Victoria climate scientist.
The changes in the last 12 years that have the scientists most alarmed are happening in the Arctic with melting summer sea ice and around the world with the loss of key land-based ice masses. It’s all happening far faster than predicted.
Back in 1997 “nobody in their wildest expectations,” would have forecast the dramatic sudden loss of summer sea ice in the Arctic that started about five years ago, Weaver said. From 1993 to 1997, sea ice would shrink on average in the summer to about 2.7 million square miles. The average for the last five years is less than 2 million square miles. What’s been lost is the size of Alaska.
Antarctica had a slight increase in sea ice, mostly because of the cooling effect of the ozone hole, according to the British Antarctic Survey. At the same time, large chunks of ice shelves — adding up to the size of Delaware — came off the Antarctic peninsula.
While melting Arctic ocean ice doesn’t raise sea levels, the melting of giant land-based ice sheets and glaciers that drain into the seas do. Those are shrinking dramatically at both poles.
Measurements show that since 2000, Greenland has lost more than 1.5 trillion tons of ice, while Antarctica has lost about 1 trillion tons since 2002, according to two scientific studies published this fall. In multiple reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports, scientists didn’t anticipate ice sheet loss in Antarctica, Weaver said. And the rate of those losses is accelerating, so that Greenland’s ice sheets are melting twice as fast now as they were just seven years ago, increasing sea level rise.
Worldwide glaciers are shrinking three times faster than in the 1970s and the average glacier has lost 25 feet of ice since 1997, said Michael Zemp, a researcher at World Glacier Monitoring Service at the University of Zurich.
“Glaciers are a good climate indicator,” Zemp said. “What we see is an accelerated loss of ice.”
Also, permafrost — the frozen northern ground that oil pipelines are built upon and which traps the potent greenhouse gas methane — is thawing at an alarming rate, Burkett said.
Another new post-1997 impact of global warming has scientists very concerned. The oceans are getting more acidic because more of the carbon dioxide in the air is being absorbed into the water. That causes acidification, an issue that didn’t even merit a name until the past few years.
More acidic water harms coral, oysters and plankton and ultimately threatens the ocean food chain, biologists say.
In 1997, “there was no interest in plants and animals” and how they are hampered by climate change, said Stanford University biologist Terry Root. Now scientists are talking about which species can be saved from extinction and which are goners. The polar bear became the first species put on the federal list of threatened species and the small rabbit-like American pika may be joining it.
More than 37 million acres of Canadian and U.S. pine forests have been damaged by beetles that don’t die in warmer winters. And in the U.S. West, the average number of acres burned per fire has more than doubled.
The Colorado River reservoirs, major water suppliers for the U.S. West, were nearly full in 1999, but by 2007 half the water was gone after the region endured the worst multiyear drought in 100 years of record-keeping.
Insurance losses and blackouts have soared and experts say global warming is partly to blame. The number of major U.S. weather-related blackouts from 2004-2008 were more than seven times higher than from 1993-1997, said Evan Mills, a staff scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
“The message on the science is that we know a lot more than we did in 1997 and it’s all negative,” said Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. “Things are much worse than the models predicted.”
The time to act is now.
Related Posts:
- An introduction to global warming impacts: Hell and High Water
- Science: CO2 levels haven’t been this high for 15 million years, when it was 5° to 10°F warmer and seas were 75 to 120 feet higher — “We have shown that this dramatic rise in sea level is associated with an increase in CO2 levels of about 100 ppm.”

RSS
Subscribe by Email
Follow Climate Progress on Twitter

Somehow I bet this doesn’t turn into a “front page thought” at the NY Times.
BTW, Joe, yesterday evening I heard Andy Revkin being interviewed on BBC World Service. He got asked a pretty direct question about whether the emails contained any sort of smoking gun and failed to answer it, leaving listeners with the impression that maybe there was something there. While he did go on to say that he’s already past covering the contents and is investigating the identity of the hacker, that didn’t repair all the damage. But perhaps I’m just being hypersensitive. That aside, this was a good example of the NYT’s coverage becoming part of the story for others.
I’ve met Seth, and he’s an endangered species: an old school reporter, determined to get to the facts, and who will not be deterred. I hope he can lead his frightened brethren by example.
“Temperatures over the past 12 years are 0.4 of a degree warmer than the dozen years leading up to 1997.”
I know you usually go with 2000s 0.2 degrees warmer than the 1990s. Is this dozen years figure a better way to present it?
[JR: I do C (and F) comparing the 2000s with the 1990s. He does F. Yes, this shows the recent jump better.]
Yes, this shows the recent jump better because it includes the 1998 El Nino heat in the recent 12 years and compares it to the volcanically cooled previous 12 years. This seems to show recent warming, because if you use 10 years then you’re comparing the recently cool period against the previous 10 years with the 1998 heat in the preceding period.
It’s even better if you compare the recent 12 years against 12 years 150 years ago, when the Little Ice Age offers many cool periods to compare against. This shows the recent jump even better.
East Antarctic melting faster than anticipated. http://www.reuters.com/ article/ environmentNews/ idUSTRE5AL15120091122
The news just does not seem to get any better…
or Go to: Environmental News Network, (ENN)
[JR: I'll blog on this soon. Word Press ate my entire first draft!]
Thanks for highlighting this story, Joe. After all the stories “catapulting the propaganda” on the purloined emails (why wasn’t that a robbery story?) it’s good to see this bad news covered.
It would be interesting to put the denier arguments from back then side-by-side and see who has fared better by history. Might be interesting, also, to note that their line back then was “global warming isn’t happening,” which they’ve now changed to “global warming is happening but humans have nothing to do with it.”
The problem I have with the “climate change let’s do something about it”. Is
1) It has turned into a cult that you dare not go against or ELSE
2) It has turned into a HUGE business, including taxation opportunity such as “carbon tax”
3) It is giving governments even more opportunity to control it’s citizens by having environmental police which has extraordinary powers that will be used for non environmental reasons.
4) Planets in our solar system are getting warmer, we can not control the sun in any shape or form. However, very little credit does it get when it comes to climate change
5) Our planet goes through continuous climate changes and it has been doing this for while without our help. Though we can be dirty pigs when it comes to consuming and wasting it still does not address the issue of governments and corporations in using this “tragedy” for wrong reasons. Which will ultimately not end up helping human kind clean up it’s act in the first place.
Dennis B #7 I suggest that you visit and read the new IPCC report.
1: When you talk about a cult, look no further than your peers.
2: You have to pay to dump your trash, why should big business get to pollute the environment for free?
3: The same can be said for control of reproductive rights.
4: The sun’s energy output has been remarkably steady with a slight dimming in the last few years, yet still the earth warms as predicted. IPCC report.
5: Fluctuations in weather and climate have happened but the last time we have seen ~400 ppm CO2 the earth was a far different place. NO PEOPLE for starters.
Go read and learn your facts then come back.
thanks admin
Are you really cool
To #7: Yep, the earth goes through various climate changes and warming cycles. The difference is, this time it IS caused by us humans (and therefore, stoppable!) and it’s happening much, much faster– too fast for species to adapt. Instead of the usual thousands of years, it’s all occurring in only about 200 years plus!