<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inhofe trashes generals who advocate for bipartisan clean energy legislation:  They crave &#8220;the limelight.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/</link>
	<description>The Latest on Climate Science, Solutions, and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:42:45 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: raleigh Latham</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-218468</link>
		<dc:creator>raleigh Latham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-218468</guid>
		<description>Next thing Inhofe will call Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, JFK, and Martin Luther King gay communists who wanted to destroy America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next thing Inhofe will call Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, JFK, and Martin Luther King gay communists who wanted to destroy America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-217929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-217929</guid>
		<description>This is beyond the pale. Inhoffe has impugned the character of respected retired military brass.  Sens. Boxer, Merkley, Whitehouse and others on the Environment Committee should publicly demand an apology from Inhoffe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is beyond the pale. Inhoffe has impugned the character of respected retired military brass.  Sens. Boxer, Merkley, Whitehouse and others on the Environment Committee should publicly demand an apology from Inhoffe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-217751</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-217751</guid>
		<description>Inhofe attacking generals as craving limelight? That is just chock-full of irony...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inhofe attacking generals as craving limelight? That is just chock-full of irony&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard pauli</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-217281</link>
		<dc:creator>richard pauli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-217281</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the newly formed AGW geography deserves his name - the Inhofe Desert Wastelands,  the Inhofe Oceanic Inundation,  an Inhofe glacier moraine.... Maybe any newly defined geological object from climate destabilization should be called an Inhofe object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the newly formed AGW geography deserves his name &#8211; the Inhofe Desert Wastelands,  the Inhofe Oceanic Inundation,  an Inhofe glacier moraine&#8230;. Maybe any newly defined geological object from climate destabilization should be called an Inhofe object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PurpleOzone</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-217219</link>
		<dc:creator>PurpleOzone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-217219</guid>
		<description>To Inhofe, attacking generals as attention-needy: &quot;Have you no shame, sir? Have you no shame?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Inhofe, attacking generals as attention-needy: &#8220;Have you no shame, sir? Have you no shame?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Greisch</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-217217</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Greisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-217217</guid>
		<description>Laughing out loud at the headline.   I didn&#039;t know Inhofe was a comedian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laughing out loud at the headline.   I didn&#8217;t know Inhofe was a comedian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leif</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-216853</link>
		<dc:creator>Leif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-216853</guid>
		<description>I have said this before but it warrants another time.  The present US military budget is $600+ billion dollars.  Full implementation of Lester Brown&#039;s Plan B 4.0 is estimated at $187 billion.  The military should fund the full &quot;first year&quot; cost&#039;s, to show good faith, out of the military budget, which would still leave $400+ billion, about 5 times the next highest which is China.  This action would not impact the national debt as the money has already been allocated.  As a concession from other world governments they would agree to fund the following year&#039;s &quot;Plan B&quot;, ~ 12% of their military budgets.  I content that two years of this action would defuse international hostilities, including terrorism, to such a degree that future funding could easily be made with savings on all military expenditures and still have some change left over.   A win, win for all, especially the earth and poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have said this before but it warrants another time.  The present US military budget is $600+ billion dollars.  Full implementation of Lester Brown&#8217;s Plan B 4.0 is estimated at $187 billion.  The military should fund the full &#8220;first year&#8221; cost&#8217;s, to show good faith, out of the military budget, which would still leave $400+ billion, about 5 times the next highest which is China.  This action would not impact the national debt as the money has already been allocated.  As a concession from other world governments they would agree to fund the following year&#8217;s &#8220;Plan B&#8221;, ~ 12% of their military budgets.  I content that two years of this action would defuse international hostilities, including terrorism, to such a degree that future funding could easily be made with savings on all military expenditures and still have some change left over.   A win, win for all, especially the earth and poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken levenson</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-216780</link>
		<dc:creator>ken levenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-216780</guid>
		<description>To really move public opinion I think Obama must appear with Military Joint Chiefs and captains of industry - every time he speaks of climate change and clean energy.   There should be an active military general there every time...he should be taking military leaders with him to Copenhagen.    

All to many seem to think this is about &quot;comfort&quot; and &quot;lifestyle&quot; - this is at root about our security and whether we like it or not, and while it may seem hard to be more militaristic to some, the military is going to play an ever more increasing role as the world is destabilized by climate change.

Time to put the military people up front on this, everyday.   The crazies will never be satisfied but most fence sitting moderately conservative folks will be swayed....and that will make a big difference politically....giving much more room to push forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To really move public opinion I think Obama must appear with Military Joint Chiefs and captains of industry &#8211; every time he speaks of climate change and clean energy.   There should be an active military general there every time&#8230;he should be taking military leaders with him to Copenhagen.    </p>
<p>All to many seem to think this is about &#8220;comfort&#8221; and &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; &#8211; this is at root about our security and whether we like it or not, and while it may seem hard to be more militaristic to some, the military is going to play an ever more increasing role as the world is destabilized by climate change.</p>
<p>Time to put the military people up front on this, everyday.   The crazies will never be satisfied but most fence sitting moderately conservative folks will be swayed&#8230;.and that will make a big difference politically&#8230;.giving much more room to push forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GS</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-216778</link>
		<dc:creator>GS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-216778</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s also a member of the Christianist cult The Family, Sen. Inhofe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s also a member of the Christianist cult The Family, Sen. Inhofe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike roddy</title>
		<link>http://climateprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-military-generals-who-advocate-for-bipartisan-clean-energy-legislation-they-crave-the-limelight/#comment-216768</link>
		<dc:creator>mike roddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climateprogress.org/?p=14731#comment-216768</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Sunday morning humor. Inhofe has pretty much earned the lifetime Dumbest Senator and Dumbest Member of Congress awards, along with making the Most Corrupt lists. From what I can tell, other countries, especially Australia and even Denmark, have legislators who could provide him with a little competition. 

I think it&#039;s time for an international competition. Could Inhofe be the dumbest member of a legislative body in the world? Show us what you&#039;ve got, Copenhagen attendees!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Sunday morning humor. Inhofe has pretty much earned the lifetime Dumbest Senator and Dumbest Member of Congress awards, along with making the Most Corrupt lists. From what I can tell, other countries, especially Australia and even Denmark, have legislators who could provide him with a little competition. </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s time for an international competition. Could Inhofe be the dumbest member of a legislative body in the world? Show us what you&#8217;ve got, Copenhagen attendees!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
